1995
DOI: 10.1006/jmra.1995.0733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton Chemical-Shift Tensors of Methyl Groups; a Multiple-Pulse NMR and LORG/IGLOab InitioStudy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For water, the difference between the MP2 and the SCF results is 17.70 ppm in the case of the isotropic shielding of the oxygen atom and 10.05 ppm for the anisotropic shielding of the carbon atom. The previous methanol values [44,48] shown in Table I for the anisotropic case were obtained at the SCF level and, as can be seen, they are in better agreement with our SCF results. A systematic study of NMR parameters for acyclic and isolated alcohols at a lower DFT level has been presented [62].…”
Section: Absolute Chemical Shieldingssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For water, the difference between the MP2 and the SCF results is 17.70 ppm in the case of the isotropic shielding of the oxygen atom and 10.05 ppm for the anisotropic shielding of the carbon atom. The previous methanol values [44,48] shown in Table I for the anisotropic case were obtained at the SCF level and, as can be seen, they are in better agreement with our SCF results. A systematic study of NMR parameters for acyclic and isolated alcohols at a lower DFT level has been presented [62].…”
Section: Absolute Chemical Shieldingssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A collection of known chemical shift anisotropies compiled by Duncan in 1990 contains about eighty proton entries, [34] a very modest number when compared with 13 C. Since then only a few single crystals have been measured by proton multiple-pulse techniques. [3537] Presumably it reflects a number of difficulties when working with single crystals. The sample preparation is challenging and so are accurate sample alignment in the magnet, peak assignment when the unit cell contains many protons, and taking care of peak shifts arising from the magnetic susceptibility of the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…s = 3 ls and pulse-duration t w = 0.8 ls was used. For further experimental details (e.g., composite preparation pulse, multi-window sampling) see [22].…”
Section: Multiple-pulse Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%