Proton elastic scattering from<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts /><mml:mrow /><mml:mrow><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow /><mml:mrow /></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>at 250 MeV and energy dependent potentials between 200 and 300 MeV

Meyer, H. O.; Schwandt, P.; Abegg, R.; Miller, C. A.; Jackson, K. P.; Yen, S.; Gaillard, G.; Hugi, M.; Helmer, R. L.; Frekers, D.; Saxena, A.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.37.544

Cited by 22 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Experimental data have been given in Ref. [19] for 19,20,22 C at 40 MeV. Since the value of incident energy is so small that the RIA calculations are not available, the Glauber calculations with the RMF density distributions are compared with experimental data instead.…”

Section: Reaction Corss Sectionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reaction cross sections of proton scattering from carbon isotopes (A=8-22) by means of the relativistic impulse approximation

Kaki

2017

Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reaction cross sections of carbon isotopes for proton scattering are calculated in large energy region. Density distributions of carbon isotopes are obtained from relativistic mean field results. Calculations are based on the relativistic impulse approximation, and results are compared with experimental data. A strong relationship between reaction cross section and root-mean-square radius is clearly shown for 12 C using a model distribution.

show abstract

Section: Reaction Corss Sectionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reaction cross sections of proton scattering from carbon isotopes (A=8-22) by means of the relativistic impulse approximation

Kaki

2017

Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The theory calculations are for one proton in the appropriate shell. The labels 'Hama' [40] and 'Meyer' [41] refer to the optical potentials used by the DWIA calculations. α0 represents an average of the cross section over the ω acceptance.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We used the optical potential of Hama et al [40] for the ω = 475 MeV measurement. For the ω = 330 MeV point, we calculated cross sections from the Hama potential and also from the parameterization of Meyer et al [41]. The Meyer potential is only fit to C(p,p) elastic scattering data for 200 to 300 MeV protons; we extrapolated it using the parametrized expressions.…”

Section: Distorted Wave Impulse Approximationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quasielastic12C(e,e′p)reaction at high momentum transfer

et al. 1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We measured the 12 C(e,e ′ p) cross section as a function of missing energy in parallel kinematics for (q, ω) = (970 MeV/c, 330 MeV) and (990 MeV/c, 475 MeV). At ω = 475 MeV, at the maximum of the quasielastic peak, there is a large continuum (Em > 50 MeV) cross section extending out to the deepest missing energy measured, amounting to almost 50% of the measured cross section. The ratio of data to DWIA calculation is 0.4 for both the p-and s-shells. At ω = 330 MeV, well below the maximum of the quasielastic peak, the continuum cross section is much smaller and the ratio of data to DWIA calculation is 0.85 for the p-shell and 1.0 for the s-shell. We infer that one or more mechanisms that increase with ω transform some of the single-nucleon-knockout into multinucleon knockout, decreasing the valence knockout cross section and increasing the continuum cross section.

show abstract

“…In Fig. 5, the cross sections for the elastic scattering data of 35 MeV [25], 51.93 MeV [26], 120 MeV [27], and 250 MeV [28] protons from 12 C are compared with the results of our model. As shown in the figure, the results of the modified model are in good agreement with the experimental data except for the large angle parts, mostly due to low statistics (1,000,000 events for each case).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of the Heisenberg principle in constrained molecular dynamics model

Wang

Bonasera

Zheng

et al. 2019

Int. J. Mod. Phys. E

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We implement the Heisenberg principle into the Constrained Molecular Dynamics (CoMD) model with a similar approach to the Pauli principle using the one-body occupation probabilityfi. Results of the modified and the original model with comparisons to data are given. The binding energies and the radii of light nuclei obtained with the modified model are more consistent to the experimental data than the original one. The collision term and the density distribution are tested through a comparison to p+ 12 C elastic scattering data. Some simulations for fragmentation and superheavy nuclei production are also discussed.

show abstract

Proton elastic scattering fromC12at 250 MeV and energy dependent potentials between 200 and 300 MeV

Cited by 22 publications

References 10 publications

Reaction cross sections of proton scattering from carbon isotopes (A=8-22) by means of the relativistic impulse approximation

Reaction cross sections of proton scattering from carbon isotopes (A=8-22) by means of the relativistic impulse approximation

Quasielastic12C(e,e′p)reaction at high momentum transfer

The role of the Heisenberg principle in constrained molecular dynamics model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About