2003
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.72.1073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton-Impact Excitations between then=2 Fine-Structure Levels of Hydrogenic Ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using these 2 orbitals, the radial Schrodinger equation is then inverted to obtain l dependent pseudo-potentials for l=0, 1. The use of pseudo-potentials prevents unphysical excitation of the s 1 , s 2 , and p 2 filled subshells during propagation of equation (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using these 2 orbitals, the radial Schrodinger equation is then inverted to obtain l dependent pseudo-potentials for l=0, 1. The use of pseudo-potentials prevents unphysical excitation of the s 1 , s 2 , and p 2 filled subshells during propagation of equation (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In laboratory plasmas proton-impact excitations are known to be important for close lying energy levels, such as those between fine-structure levels of hydrogenic atomic ions [1]. It is expected that proton-impact collisions will be important in solar flares, where very high energy and dynamic conditions exist [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it does not hold for d and f states, since the electron mass is small, and some low-lying partial waves determine their cross sections. This is in contrast to ion impact, where, except at very low collisions, much more partial waves contribute to the cross section even for optically forbidden transitions [40]. where the calculation has been simplified [30,43] owing to the orthogonality relations of the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Y lm and Y J M l , appear in (A.11) and (A.12), and to the relations used for (A.10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite large partial waves might have to be involved for the annihilation from p states at high energies since ns in (1) is small. For such a reason, we have used the semiclassical treatment called the common trajectory method [38][39][40], which becomes effective for higher collision energies and for larger partial waves.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%