2001
DOI: 10.1142/9789812811646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton Radiotherapy Accelerators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This introduces additional considerations to the transport and design of the beamline and also results in several differences to the beam quality and properties. Extensive details can be found in literature [5,8,9,10,11] however for the context of ocular treatments, we mention some key physical characteristics. Facilities which operate at close to the maximum machine energy are able to generate a fixed, passively scattered beam with minimal energy or range straggling effects.…”
Section: Facility and Treatment Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This introduces additional considerations to the transport and design of the beamline and also results in several differences to the beam quality and properties. Extensive details can be found in literature [5,8,9,10,11] however for the context of ocular treatments, we mention some key physical characteristics. Facilities which operate at close to the maximum machine energy are able to generate a fixed, passively scattered beam with minimal energy or range straggling effects.…”
Section: Facility and Treatment Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protons, like heavy ions, interact differently with matter when compared to electromagnetic radiation, such as X-Rays and Gamma Rays. The intensity of the beam decays exponentially with depth for the electromagnetic radiation, and thus does not have a wide reach (WIESZCZYKA; SCHARF, 2001).…”
Section: Considerations For a Proton Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 of (MAGALLANES; HERNÁNDEZ; FER- NÁNDEZ, 2015) with the energy deposition curves by photons and protons beams. According to (WIESZCZYKA;SCHARF, 2001), the use of proton beam therapy has an advantage over X-ray bundles and gamma rays because protons have a higher deposition of ionizing energy in depth with reduced lateral scattering, unlike photons and, therefore, provide a low attack less to healthy tissues posterior and anterior to the tumor. Therefore, the concentration of energy deposition in a specific region (Bragg peak) is one of the most important characteristic of proton beam.…”
Section: Considerations For a Proton Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Russian programmes at ITEP and at St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute/CRIRR were also quite successful. 57,58,59,60 Following experiments initiated at NIRS (Chiba) and at Tsukuba at the end of the 1970s, 61,62 Japan has become one of the world's largest users of both proton and heavy ion therapy. 63 Stopped-beam treatments with protons (i.e.…”
Section: History Of Particle Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%