2004
DOI: 10.1134/1.1842302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton structure functions over the entire kinematical region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20]) uses the ALLM model [21], while BM and KLS both consider the CKMT model [22] at low Q 2 matched at high Q 2 to perturbative QCD predictions based on different parameterizations of parton distribution functions, and PT uses the proton structure function of Ref. [23]. The F p 2 structure function is shown in Figs.…”
Section: The Photonuclear Tau Energy Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20]) uses the ALLM model [21], while BM and KLS both consider the CKMT model [22] at low Q 2 matched at high Q 2 to perturbative QCD predictions based on different parameterizations of parton distribution functions, and PT uses the proton structure function of Ref. [23]. The F p 2 structure function is shown in Figs.…”
Section: The Photonuclear Tau Energy Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other widely used results are obtained on basis of parameterisations of data using Regge theory [17,18]. A recent comparative study shows that all these calculations give rates of photonuclear energy loss in good agreement [19], except for [20] which results in a significantly higher rate at energies above 10 8 GeV. A new calculation based on saturation physics [21] is also presented in [19].…”
Section: A the Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant source of τ energy losses at E τ > 6 EeV comes from the photonuclear interactions, whose description relies on the proper modelisation of the nucleon structure functions at low x and high Q 2 . Several calculations of the corresponding cross section, based on different theoretical models, can be found in the literature [9][10][11][12]. All of them give comparable results except for [11] which gives a significantly higher loss rate, and for [12] which gives a rate more than a factor of 2 lower than the standard one at the highest energies (∼ 10 12 GeV).…”
Section: ν τ and τ Propagation: Gen-eral Transport Equationsmentioning
confidence: 85%