The FeMo cofactor
(FeMoco) of Mo nitrogenase is responsible for
reducing dinitrogen to ammonia, but it requires the addition of 3–4
e–/H+ pairs before N2 even
binds. A binding site at the Fe2/Fe3/Fe6/Fe7 face of the cofactor
has long been suggested based on mutation studies, with Fe2 or Fe6
nowadays being primarily discussed as possibilities. However, the
nature of N2 binding to the cofactor is enigmatic as the
metal ions are coordinatively saturated in the resting state with
no obvious binding site. Furthermore, the cofactor consists of high-spin
Fe(II)/Fe(III) ions (antiferromagnetically coupled but also mixed-valence
delocalized), which are not known to bind N2. This suggests
that an Fe binding site with a different molecular and electronic
structure than the resting state must be responsible for the experimentally
known N2 binding in the E4
state
of FeMoco. We have systematically studied N2 binding to
Fe2 and Fe6 sites of FeMoco at the broken-symmetry QM/MM level as
a function of the redox-, spin-, and protonation state of the cofactor.
The local and global electronic structure changes to the cofactor
taking place during redox events, protonation, Fe–S cleavage,
hydride formation, and N2 coordination are systematically
analyzed. Localized orbital and quasi-restricted orbital analysis
via diamagnetic substitution is used to get insights into the local
single Fe ion electronic structure in various states of FeMoco. A
few factors emerge as essential to N2 binding in the calculations:
spin-pairing of dxz
and dyz
orbitals of the N2-binding Fe ion, a
coordination change at the N2-binding Fe ion aided by a
hemilabile protonated sulfur, and finally hydride ligation. The results
show that N2 binding to E0
, E1
, and E2
models is generally
unfavorable, likely due to the high-energy cost of stabilizing the
necessary spin-paired electronic structure of the N2-binding
Fe ion in a ligand environment that clearly favors high-spin states.
The results for models of E4
, however, suggest
a feasible model for why N2 binding occurs experimentally
in the E4
state. E4
models with two bridging hydrides between Fe2 and Fe6 show much
more favorable N2 binding than other models. When two hydrides
coordinate to the same Fe ion, an increased ligand-field splitting
due to octahedral coordination at either Fe2 or Fe6 is found. This
altered ligand field makes it easier for the Fe ion to acquire a spin-paired
electronic structure with doubly occupied dxz
and dyz
orbitals that backbond to a
terminal N2 ligand. Within this model for N2 binding, both Fe2 and Fe6 emerge as possible binding site scenarios.
Due to steric effects involving the His195 residue, affecting both
the N2 ligand and the terminal SH– group,
distinguishing between Fe2 and Fe6 is difficult; furthermore, the
binding depends on the protonation state of His195.