1980
DOI: 10.1021/ja00528a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton-transfer reactions involving alkyl ions and alkenes. Rate constants, isomerization processes, and the derivation of thermochemical data

Abstract: Rate constants and mechanisms have been determined for proton-transfer reactions of the type AH+ + M <=; MH + + A, where A is propylene, isobutene, írani-2-butene, cyclopentene, and cyclohexene. In order to avoid competing side effects the AH+ reactant ions are generated in alkanes and alkyl halides. It is observed that the rate constants for exothermic direct proton transfer reactions, from AH+ to M or from MH+ to A, are equal to the collision rate only when the total rotational, vibrational, and electronic e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with extensive studies on the isomerization of sec-C4H; to t-C4H; (25). Even if the former ion were the immediate product of reaction [lo], the high temperature and the presence of the dipolar ethyl chloride (kD = 2.1 D) would cause very rapid isomerization (26).…”
Section: Benzenesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is consistent with extensive studies on the isomerization of sec-C4H; to t-C4H; (25). Even if the former ion were the immediate product of reaction [lo], the high temperature and the presence of the dipolar ethyl chloride (kD = 2.1 D) would cause very rapid isomerization (26).…”
Section: Benzenesupporting
confidence: 86%
“… a kJ/mol; b J K −1 mol −1 ; c Meot‐Ner (1983); d Hunter & Lias (1998) (entropy terms into parentheses are estimated values indicated as such in the original reference); e MP2/6‐31+G(d) calculations (Ganguly & Fuchs, 1997); f Lias, Shold, & Ausloos (1980); g Bromilow et al (1981); h Kabli et al (2006); i Sharma, Blades, & Kebarle (1984); j Adötoledo et al (1998). …”
Section: Alcohols and Ethersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This agrees well with other values ( 192.3,9 193.312) obtainedlo by combining the relative heats of formation of t-C4H$ and i-C3H: (ref. 11) with the absolute heat of formation of the latter.9J' However, a direct determination of AHf ( t -C4H;) by Traeger In the MNDO formalism AHf(H+) is defined by the parametric value of the one-center core-electron attraction integral Us, chosen to accommodate best the heats of formation of hydrocarbons.3(h) This procedure, however, leads to an empirical value of Us, , which differs significantly from that appropriate to an isolated hydrogen atom. This results in a calculated heat of formation of the proton which compares very poorly with the 365.7 kcal mol-l determined e~perimenta1ly.l~ We therefore decided to base the "calculated" PAS not on the MNIIo value but on the experimental value of AH,(H+).…”
Section: B + H + -B H + P a = -A Hmentioning
confidence: 99%