2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-27982/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton versus photon radiotherapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity-matched analysis

Abstract: Abstract Background Proton radiotherapy has a dosimetric advantage over photon radiotherapy. Many retrospective studies have shown promising results with proton radiotherapy in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, clinical evidence demonstrating the benefit of protons over photons is still limited. We therefore compared the clinical outcomes of the two modalities using medical research databases from our medical foundation. Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A propensity-matched analysis from Taiwan also found a significantly improved median survival for patients who received proton therapy compared with those who received photon therapy (not reached vs 17.4 months, P < .01). 23 Similarly, they reported a significantly decreased risk of radiation-related liver injury in the proton group compared with the photon group (12 vs 36%, P < .01). The current report includes 11 patients (30%) with CP 7 to 9 disease, and notably, 3 of these patients (8%) had CP 9 disease (the latter were not included in the previously mentioned MDACC retrospective series).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A propensity-matched analysis from Taiwan also found a significantly improved median survival for patients who received proton therapy compared with those who received photon therapy (not reached vs 17.4 months, P < .01). 23 Similarly, they reported a significantly decreased risk of radiation-related liver injury in the proton group compared with the photon group (12 vs 36%, P < .01). The current report includes 11 patients (30%) with CP 7 to 9 disease, and notably, 3 of these patients (8%) had CP 9 disease (the latter were not included in the previously mentioned MDACC retrospective series).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A proton beam has the physical advantage of creating a "Bragg peak" with a finite range of energy deposition with no exit dose beyond the target (Figure 3D). Therefore, compared with photon modalities, it is possible to solely irradiate a targeted liver tumor with higher doses using PBT while sparing surrounding tissues and organs (15), with consequently improved clinical outcomes (16,17). Retrospective data have shown promising clinical results for PBT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future clinical trials, much caution is needed for hepatic toxicity analysis of differences between PBT and XRT. Cheng et al and Sanford et al compared patients who undergo PBT or XRT for liver tumors, retrospectively, and reported improved survival and lower adverse event incidence with PBT [7] , [8] . Their studies are important in showing the benefits of PBT, however, the patients included in both studies had not been stratified by factors influencing liver doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In primary liver tumors, photon-based stereotactic body radiotherapy has been widely used and reported to have favorable treatment results [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] . For a more precise treatment, proton beam therapy (PBT) has also been applied, and improved results have been reported [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] . Due to its physical properties, PBT can be expected to reduce the dose to the normal liver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%