2012
DOI: 10.1021/ic301642w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protonation of a Peroxodiiron(III) Complex and Conversion to a Diiron(III/IV) Intermediate: Implications for Proton-Assisted O–O Bond Cleavage in Nonheme Diiron Enzymes

Abstract: Oxygenation of a diiron(II) complex,[FeII2(μ-OH)2(BnBQA)2(NCMe)2]2+ (2) (where BnBQA is N-benzyl-N,N-bis(2-quinolinylmethyl)amine) results in the formation of a metastable peroxodiferric intermediate (3). Treatment of 3 with strong acid affords its conjugate acid 4 in which the (μ-oxo)(μ-1,2-peroxo)diiron(III) core of 3 is protonated at the oxo bridge. The core structures of 3 and 4 are characterized in detail by UV-vis, Mössbauer, resonance Raman, and X-ray absorption spectroscopies. Complex 4 is shorter live… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
73
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
8
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data suggests that dioxygen is likely bound to the diiron(III) center as a 1,2-peroxo bridge [20]. Based on the available structures for synthetic peroxo-bridged diiron(III) complexes [50, 51, 7072], such a ligand would be expected to have Fe–O bond distances of 1.87 – 1.98 Å, consistent with our observed distance of 1.98 Å.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data suggests that dioxygen is likely bound to the diiron(III) center as a 1,2-peroxo bridge [20]. Based on the available structures for synthetic peroxo-bridged diiron(III) complexes [50, 51, 7072], such a ligand would be expected to have Fe–O bond distances of 1.87 – 1.98 Å, consistent with our observed distance of 1.98 Å.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This value is consistent with our previously published data [20] and higher than observed for hDOHH- R . hDOHH- P is likely 6-coordinate by comparison to synthetic 6-coordinate diferric peroxo complexes, which have pre-edge values that range from 13 – 16 units [5052]. In contrast, hDOHH- P • S has a pre-edge feature centered higher in energy at 7114.1 eV with an area of 16.2 units, increased from hDOHH- P , indicating that the addition of substrate has decreased the symmetry around the diiron center.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the starting point, we consider the direct abstraction of the C 10 −H hydrogen atom by the "unactivated" P intermediate having the 1,2-μ peroxo structure (Scheme 2, path 1). Eight alternative reaction pathways are evaluated (paths 2−9), which involve a reactant that is derived from P via activation by a proton (2,4,5), water molecule (3), electron (6), electron/proton couple (7 and 8), or electron and water molecule (9). These pathways are discussed below.…”
Section: Description Of the O−o And C−h Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In work aimed at understanding how this might occur, reactions of (μ-1,2-peroxo)diiron(III,III) complexes with protic acids have been explored. Treatment of 70 ( Figure 35) with HClO 4 or HNO 3 was shown to result in initial protonation of the oxo bridge (71), followed by decay to the (μ-oxo)-diiron(III,IV) complex 72 that models intermediate X in ribonucleotide reductase [245]. Mechanistic details such as the source of the reducing equivalent required or how proton transfer from the hydroxo group induces breaking of the peroxo O-O bond in this system have yet to be elucidated.…”
Section: (Peroxo)diiron Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%