This therapeutic approach is clearly highly efficacious; however, the safety of this strategy has become an important concern. In a recent clinical trial, patients were administered a synthetic A peptide (AN-1792) plus adjuvant, and Ϸ6% of these patients developed aseptic meningoencephalitis, most likely mediated by braininfiltrating activated T cells (3,4). This serious side effect led to suspension of the clinical trial. Furthermore, passive transfer of A antibodies to transgenic AD mice results in cerebral microhemorrhage, a potentially adverse side effect (5, 6). Uncovering of these adverse events has redirected A vaccination strategies toward the goal of developing an approach that is both safe and effective.Studies examining the brains of A-vaccinated patients developing meningoencephalitis implicate A-reactive T cell subsets as major components of this deleterious response to active A vaccination (7, 8). To subvert possible meningoencephalitis resulting from A vaccination, various strategies have been attempted. Interestingly, recent works suggest that A-derived peptides delivered intranasally (with adjuvant) to mucosal epithelial tissues results in effective clearance of A plaques and improvement of cognitive function in animal models of AD. Moreover, T cell reactivity appeared to be considerably reduced compared with other active immunization strategies. In other studies, differential T cell responses depended on the epitope/fragment of A peptide used for vaccination. Specifically, portions of the A peptide seemed to stimulate different T cell responses, resulting in either proinflammatory T helper (Th) cell type 1 (Th1) responses or antiinflammatory Th cell type 2 (Th2) responses (9, 10). Such findings imply that A vaccination is not only efficacious, but may also prove to be safe and therefore a feasible strategy for AD therapy depending on a number of factors, including route of delivery, adjuvant choice, and A epitope administered.The skin is a well established effective route for vaccination, including delivery of peptide-based vaccines (11-13). Strong humoral and cellular immune responses have been elicited after transcutaneous (t.c.) vaccination (14), largely owing to the diverse populations of resident antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and other immune cells in the various dermal layers. Subsets of dermalresident Langerhans cell (LC) precursors, known as migratory CD14 ϩ LC precursors, are important immune regulators that demonstrate ''professional'' APC capability, including reducing T cell stimulatory function by producing antiinflammatory cytokines (15). Also, skin-resident keratinocytes release the antiinflammatory cytokine IL-10 in response to certain stimuli. Keratinocytederived IL-10 serves to buffer harmful proinflammatory immune activation and thereby preserves skin barrier integrity (16).Taken together, these lines of evidence led us to hypothesize that targeting A immunotherapy to skin tissue might provide an immunotherapeutic approach that is both efficacious and safe. In...