Prototype-oriented development of high-performance systems

Justo, G.R.R.; Vekariya, P.; Delaitre, Thierry; Zemerly, Mohamed Jamal; Winter, Stephen

doi:10.1109/pdse.1997.596828

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The creation of traditional, procedural, algorithmic software has led to three major schools of development: (1) those who use a methodological approach that follow stage-based process models such as Boehm's spiral model (Boehm, 1988;Boehm & Hansen, 2001) or Royce's waterfall model (Royce, 1970), (2) those who advocate prototyping (Ribeiro Justo et al, 1997), and (3) those who advocate the utilisation of formal methods of specification (Jones, 1980). More recent object-oriented methodologies rely on processes such as the unified process (Jacobson et al, 1999).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Methodologies for the development of knowledge-based systems, 1982–2002

Plant

Gamble

2003

The Knowledge Engineering Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Knowledge-based systems have often been criticised for the limited theoretical base upon which they are constructed. This view asserts that systems are often developed in an ad hoc, individual way that leads to unmaintainable, unreliable and non-rigorous systems. The last decade, however, has seen an increased effort to produce methodologies to counter this view as well as continued research into validation and verification techniques. This paper presents a brief discussion of some of the important research in knowledge-based system life cycles and development methods. Methodologies are considered and are discussed in light of two sets of quality assurance criteria.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%