2010
DOI: 10.2478/v10120-009-0017-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protozoan impact on bacterial biofilm formation

Abstract: Confocal laser scanning microscopy in combination with digital image analysis was used to assess the impact of protozoa on bacterial colonisation of surfaces. Bacterial biofi lms were developed from activated sludge in microscope fl ow cells and were exposed to the grazing pressure of protozoa. The protozoan community from healthy activated sludge and a culture of fl agellate Bodo saltans were used as grazers. Experiments comprised 48-h incubations in 3 treatment variants: bacteria with protozoa, bacteria with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Protozoa have also been demonstrated to excrete growth stimulating products which could potentially induce flocculation [ 48 ]. For example, the co-incubation of activated sludge bacteria with sludge protozoa composed of attached, crawling ciliates, flagellates and amoeba for 48 h, resulted in biofilms that had 2000% more biomass than the biofilms that were not exposed to protozoan predation [ 11 ]. In addition, polymeric substances such as extrusomes, cellular debris and undigested residues secreted from protozoa could also facilitate aggregation between bacterial flocs [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protozoa have also been demonstrated to excrete growth stimulating products which could potentially induce flocculation [ 48 ]. For example, the co-incubation of activated sludge bacteria with sludge protozoa composed of attached, crawling ciliates, flagellates and amoeba for 48 h, resulted in biofilms that had 2000% more biomass than the biofilms that were not exposed to protozoan predation [ 11 ]. In addition, polymeric substances such as extrusomes, cellular debris and undigested residues secreted from protozoa could also facilitate aggregation between bacterial flocs [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mixed-species consortia there was an increase by ∼2.5-fold in total bacterial cell numbers (all four species combined) in the grazed biofilm compared to the non-grazed biofilm, whereas in the planktonic fractions grazing reduced total cell numbers by ∼1.8-fold, emphasizing the protective nature of the biofilm mode of life. Evidence that grazing pressure is positively correlated with the formation of cell clusters has come from both monospecies laboratory biofilm ( Matz et al, 2004 , 2005 ) and from natural/semi-natural multispecies biofilm ( Wey et al, 2008 ; Rychert and Neu, 2010 ; Corno et al, 2015 ). Grazing induced biofilm formation could reflect either an active defense mechanism ( Matz and Kjelleberg, 2005 ; Friman and Buckling, 2014 ) or a passive mechanical process where the movement of the protozoan cells drives the bacterial cells to the substratum ( Wey et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the addition of AHLs to the SBR markedly increased the production of EPS, which mediates contact between bacterial cells [8,9]. Other biological factors such as predation have been demonstrated to enhance bio lm formation for several bacterial species [10][11][12]. Predation on those free-living bacteria may therefore represent a strong pressure selecting for bacteria that are tightly embedded in aggregates of biomass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%