IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications 2014
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2014.6848200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provable per-link delay-optimal CSMA for general wireless network topology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using Lemma 1 and (11), the BFE for any (b f , b v ) that satisfies the feasibility constraints in (13), (15) is given by…”
Section: Bethe Approximation For Csmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using Lemma 1 and (11), the BFE for any (b f , b v ) that satisfies the feasibility constraints in (13), (15) is given by…”
Section: Bethe Approximation For Csmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark: Since we are only interested in the Bethe optimization problem (13), throughout this paper, we implicitly assume that the factor and variable marginals (b f , b v ) satisfy the feasibility conditions in (13), (15), and use the BFE (19).…”
Section: Bethe Approximation For Csmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors of [8][9][10] proposed decentralized random access protocols that achieve full throughput when each user knows the maximum queue length in the system or all other users' transmission results. When channel sensing is allowed, carrier sense multiple access (CSMA) protocols, proposed in [11][12][13][14][15][16], achieve full throughput when the channel sensing portion of time is not taken into account in the throughput calculation. A survey of CSMA protocols is presented in [17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of CSMA protocols is presented in [17]. In terms of delay performance, the CSMA protocols proposed in [15,16] achieve delay that is linear in the number of users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%