2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2017.460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provable Self-Representation Based Outlier Detection in a Union of Subspaces

Abstract: Many computer vision tasks involve processing large amounts of data contaminated by outliers, which need to be detected and rejected. While outlier detection methods based on robust statistics have existed for decades, only recently have methods based on sparse and low-rank representation been developed along with guarantees of correct outlier detection when the inliers lie in one or more lowdimensional subspaces. This paper proposes a new outlier detection method that combines tools from sparse representation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use similar setup as in (You, Robinson, and Vidal 2017), the experimental results are presented in Table 3. The results of the other methods are from (Sabokrou et al 2018) and (Kimura and Yanagihara 2018).…”
Section: Results On Caltech-256mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use similar setup as in (You, Robinson, and Vidal 2017), the experimental results are presented in Table 3. The results of the other methods are from (Sabokrou et al 2018) and (Kimura and Yanagihara 2018).…”
Section: Results On Caltech-256mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each category has at least 80 images. Following previous works (You, Robinson, and Vidal 2017;Sabokrou et al 2018), we randomly select images from n ∈ {1, 3, 5} categories as inliers, and for those categories that have more than 150 images, only the first 150 images are used. A certain number of outliers are randomly selected from the "clutter" category, such that each experiment has exactly 50% outliers.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• FMS is a non-convex robust subspace recovery approach [41], designed to be least affected by corruptions in the training set and has been demonstrated to converge to a close vicinity of the correct subspace within few iterations • SRO obtains a weighted directed graph, defines a Markov Chain via self-representation, and identifies outliers via random walks [42]. The SRO method can be considered as one of the leading unsupervised approaches for novelty detection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FMS method is a non-convex robust subspace recovery approach [41], designed to be least affected by corruptions in the training set and has been demonstrated to converge to a close vicinity of the correct subspace within few iterations. A leading unsupervised technique among others is that of SRO [42] which obtains a weighted directed graph, defines a Markov Chain via self-representation, and identifies outliers via random walks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the proposed threshold in [22] is independent of the dimension of the subspace r or the number of outliers, the underlying optimization problem is not parameter free and since multiple optimization problems have to be solved, the procedure is also rather complex. Another self-representation based algorithm for detecting outliers from a union of subspaces is proposed in [24], based on random walks in a graph, but it is iterative and requires multiple parameters to be set.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%