2008
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2008.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provably Efficient Online Nonclairvoyant Adaptive Scheduling

Abstract: To the best of our knowledge, GRAD is the first nonclairvoyant scheduling algorithm that offers such guarantees. We also believe that our new approach of resource requestallotment protocol deserves further exploration.The simulation results show that, for non-batched jobs, the makespan produced by GRAD is no more than 1.39 times of the optimal on average. For batched jobs, the mean response time produced by GRAD is no more than 2.37 times of the optimal on average.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected sensitivity precision, F‐score, and G‐mean for evaluating the performance. These metrics are widely used in imbalanced learning 78‐82 . All parameters of sensitivity (Equation ) precision (Equation ), sensitivity (Equation ), F‐score (Equation ), and G‐mean (Equation ) are taken from confusion matrix Table 5 and description are given in Table 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We selected sensitivity precision, F‐score, and G‐mean for evaluating the performance. These metrics are widely used in imbalanced learning 78‐82 . All parameters of sensitivity (Equation ) precision (Equation ), sensitivity (Equation ), F‐score (Equation ), and G‐mean (Equation ) are taken from confusion matrix Table 5 and description are given in Table 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metrics are widely used in imbalanced learning. [78][79][80][81][82] All parameters of sensitivity (Equation 31) precision (Equation 30), sensitivity (Equation 31), F-score (Equation 32), and G-mean (Equation 33) are taken from confusion matrix Table 5 and description are given in Table 6. Our main focusing metric is to reduce information loss and excessive elimination with significant improvement in sensitivity and G mean.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most works related scarcity of samples rely on a base set with adequate samples and pay more attention to few-shot classification rather than learning a general representation under data with long-tail distribution. In addition, some classical strategies [19], [20] against imbalance problem have been made full use in current deep learning frameworks, including resampling [21], [22] and cost-sentitive learning [23], [24]. However, there are still many limitations such as discarding samples for under-sampling or introducing additional noises (e.g., assigning larger penalty on outlier samples).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, unlike the non-clairvoyant algorithms MultiLaps and N-EQUI, both of which require non-uniform speed scaling for an individual job, U-CEQ only requires allocating processors of uniform speed to a job. Thus, in situations where the instantaneous parallelism of a job does not change frequently and can be effectively measured, e.g., by using feedback mechanisms [1,28,45], our IP-clairvoyant algorithm may be easier to implement and more practical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%