2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provenance and recycling of Arabian desert sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
92
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
5
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jafurah dunes contain a few zircon grains yielding Paleogene, Late Cretaceous, Jurassic or Permian ages ( fig. 9 in Garzanti et al, 2013a), which are not documented in Arabia but are common in Mesopotamian river sands, thus confirming subordinate minor sediment contribution from the latter.…”
Section: Long-distance Sediment Dispersal In Arid Climatementioning
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Jafurah dunes contain a few zircon grains yielding Paleogene, Late Cretaceous, Jurassic or Permian ages ( fig. 9 in Garzanti et al, 2013a), which are not documented in Arabia but are common in Mesopotamian river sands, thus confirming subordinate minor sediment contribution from the latter.…”
Section: Long-distance Sediment Dispersal In Arid Climatementioning
confidence: 70%
“…(Garzanti et al, 2013a) to conclude that only a few zircon grains may be recycled from sandstones intercalated in the carbonate-dominated succession accreted in the Zagros fold-thrust belt and originally derived from Arabia. Tigris sand is characterized by late Oligocene ages, Eocene ages,…”
Section: Detrital-zircon Geochronologymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations