2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2023.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provenance of specimen and data – A prerequisite for AI development in computational pathology

Markus Plass,
Rudolf Wittner,
Petr Holub
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To maximise automation, we needed a preliminary step called ‘ data source onboarding’ , in which metadata on each data source is defined and stored in a dedicated catalogue. This catalogue of data sources includes FAIR metadata enriched with (i) information on the structure and content of the data, such as data type, value restriction and value set, (ii) provenance information related to creation, modification and validation of the source information ( 25 , 26 ), and (iii) semantic mapping with concepts defined in the reference ontology. Metadata on data sources is collected once, in each data holder organisation; it is used each time the system ingests and curates the data of a specific patient.…”
Section: Results (Interim)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maximise automation, we needed a preliminary step called ‘ data source onboarding’ , in which metadata on each data source is defined and stored in a dedicated catalogue. This catalogue of data sources includes FAIR metadata enriched with (i) information on the structure and content of the data, such as data type, value restriction and value set, (ii) provenance information related to creation, modification and validation of the source information ( 25 , 26 ), and (iii) semantic mapping with concepts defined in the reference ontology. Metadata on data sources is collected once, in each data holder organisation; it is used each time the system ingests and curates the data of a specific patient.…”
Section: Results (Interim)mentioning
confidence: 99%