DOI: 10.33915/etd.5846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provenance of the Hamilton Group: A Study of Source-to-Sink Relationships within the Middle Devonian Central Appalachian Basin

Abstract: Little is known of the provenance of detrital clays in the Hamilton Group, which contains one of the most lucrative unconventional shale gas plays in the world. The Hamilton Group consists of both the organic-rich Marcellus Shale and the overlying, clay-rich Mahantango Formation. This research, in collaboration with the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environmental Laboratory (MSEEL) project, aims to constrain the provenance of the two units within the Hamilton Group and evaluate paleoclimate indicators in order to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Marcellus Shale and the Mahantango Formations are both composed primarily of mud rock, although the rocks of the Marcellus Shale Formation are more organic-rich ( Figure 1). Recent studies on the Hamilton Group in this part of the basin have indicated that variations in paleoenvironmental conditions and sources of sediment influx were responsible for the differences in lithological composition, age, mineralogy, and geochemistry of the different formations (Wang and Carr, 2013;Wang et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2015;Chen and Sharma, 2016;Hupp, 2017). All these units were deposited in the shallow to the deep marine environment, however, the Marcellus Shale was deposited in relatively deeper anoxic conditions compared to the Mahantango Formation (Boyce et.…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Marcellus Shale and the Mahantango Formations are both composed primarily of mud rock, although the rocks of the Marcellus Shale Formation are more organic-rich ( Figure 1). Recent studies on the Hamilton Group in this part of the basin have indicated that variations in paleoenvironmental conditions and sources of sediment influx were responsible for the differences in lithological composition, age, mineralogy, and geochemistry of the different formations (Wang and Carr, 2013;Wang et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2015;Chen and Sharma, 2016;Hupp, 2017). All these units were deposited in the shallow to the deep marine environment, however, the Marcellus Shale was deposited in relatively deeper anoxic conditions compared to the Mahantango Formation (Boyce et.…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A horizontal Armstrong well has produced 0.45 BCF/1000ft lateral (WVDEP, 2019) so far and a nearby horizontal CSA well totaling 0.41 BCF/1000ft lateral (PADEP, 2019). Results from provenance analysis of these cores are compared to five other locations in the region to constrain regional detrital sediment input and its relationship to spatial and temporal patterns of organic matter deposition (Caesar et al, 2010;Hupp, 2017;Phan et al, 2018). Furthermore, this study assesses the impact of thermal maturity on the organic-rich facies as part of the comparison (Fig.…”
Section: Controls On Marcellus Shale Tocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…% TOC versus εNd. Monongalia County data fromHupp (2017), Greene and Tioga County fromPhan et al (2018), and Taylor and Clearfield County data from this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation