2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10900-016-0292-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provider Perspectives on Promoting Cervical Cancer Screening Among Refugee Women

Abstract: Objective Many refugees in the United States emigrated from countries where the incidence of cervical cancer is high. Refugee women are unlikely to have been screened for cervical cancer prior to resettlement in the U.S. National organizations recommend cervical cancer screening for refugee women soon after resettlement. We sought to identify health and social service providers’ perspectives on promoting cervical cancer screening in order to inform the development of effective programs to increase screening am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model posits that the interaction of predisposing (i.e., demographics, health beliefs, and social structure), enabling (i.e., personal, family, and community resources), and need-for-care factors (i.e., perceived and evaluated health concerns) determine the use of health services (in this case, cervical cancer screening; Babitsch, Gohl, & von Lengerke, 2012; Gelberg, Andersen, & Leake, 2000). Our video was developed based on input from community advisors from Karen-Burmese and Nepali-Bhutanese refugee communities; key informant interviews with individuals from refugee resettlement organizations; focus groups with Karen-Burmese and Nepali-Bhutanese refugee women; and our previous experience producing cervical cancer screening education videos for other Asian refugee groups (Burke et al, 2004; Lor et al, 2017; Mahloch et al, 1999; Zhang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The model posits that the interaction of predisposing (i.e., demographics, health beliefs, and social structure), enabling (i.e., personal, family, and community resources), and need-for-care factors (i.e., perceived and evaluated health concerns) determine the use of health services (in this case, cervical cancer screening; Babitsch, Gohl, & von Lengerke, 2012; Gelberg, Andersen, & Leake, 2000). Our video was developed based on input from community advisors from Karen-Burmese and Nepali-Bhutanese refugee communities; key informant interviews with individuals from refugee resettlement organizations; focus groups with Karen-Burmese and Nepali-Bhutanese refugee women; and our previous experience producing cervical cancer screening education videos for other Asian refugee groups (Burke et al, 2004; Lor et al, 2017; Mahloch et al, 1999; Zhang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focus group participants also identified issues related to the health care system that make it difficult to get cervical cancer screening, including their limited English proficiency, concerns about health insurance and health care costs, transportation difficulties, and uneasiness about seeing male providers for women’s health exams. Based on recommendations from our community advisors as well as refugee resettlement organization personnel, we avoided clinical, technical, and complicated terminology (Zhang et al, 2017). For example, the videos include simple messages that focus on promoting regular Pap testing rather than messages addressing detailed guidelines for interval Pap testing and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are several actions that providers can take in order to make cervical cancer screening more accessible and acceptable to refugee women. Education in the patient's native language about the purpose of screening and a step-by-step description of the procedure helps provide knowledge and reassurance (Anaman, Correa-Velez & King, 2016;Abdullahi, Copping, Kessel, Luck & Bonell, 2013;Zhang et al, 2016). In addition, having female-only providers and interpreters and deferring the Pap smear until the second clinic visit can also make the procedure more acceptable to the patient.…”
Section: Type Imentioning
confidence: 99%