Providing eyewitnesses with initial retrieval support: what works at immediate and subsequent recall?

Krix, Alana C.; Sauerland, Melanie; Gabbert, Fiona; Hope, Lorraine

doi:10.1080/1068316x.2014.902456

Cited by 21 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The present study is an overarching analysis and combines data from two experiments (Experiment 1: n = 88; Experiment 2: n = 81; reported in Krix et al, 2014). In both experiments, participants were tested individually and randomly assigned to the interview conditions, receiving either an SAI© or a free recall as the recall tool.…”

Section: Methods Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These were excluded from the current analyses for the following WORKING AND SOURCE MEMORY AND RETRIEVAL SUPPORT 11 reasons. The divided attention manipulation impaired subsequent recall performance (see Krix et al, 2014, for a comprehensive description of methodology and findings). As distraction disrupts encoding, the quality of the stored information is degraded (Craik, Govoni, Naveh-Benjamin, & Anderson, 1996).…”

Section: Methods Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The pattern of recall performance was analogous across both experiments (see Krix et al, 2014). Participants were native speakers of German (n = 101) or Dutch (n = 24).…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…German and Dutch translations of the original English version of the SAI© (Gabbert et al, 2009;see Hope et al, 2011, for a detailed description) were used (see Krix et al, 2014, for previous use of these materials). First, witnesses were asked to mentally reinstate the context.…”

Section: Sai©mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, the SAI© makes use of multiple and varied retrieval, which has been proven beneficial for recall performance because details that cannot be accessed with one method may well become accessible with another one (Tulving & Watkins, 1975). It has been found that the SAI© induces a more comprehensive account than a control interview (i.e., a free recall), without compromising accuracy (Gabbert et al, 2009;Gawrylowicz, Memon, & Scoboria, 2014;Krix, Sauerland, Gabbert, & Hope, 2014), and can preserve memory for a subsequent interview (Hope, Gabbert, Fisher, & Jamieson, 2014;Krix et al, 2014).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

How effective is retrieval support for witnesses with different levels of working and source memory?

Krix

Sauerland

Gabbert

et al. 2015

Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methods Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methods Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The pattern of recall performance was analogous across both experiments (see Krix et al, 2014). Participants were native speakers of German (n = 101) or Dutch (n = 24).…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sai©mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

How effective is retrieval support for witnesses with different levels of working and source memory?

Krix

Sauerland

Gabbert

et al. 2015

Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Krix

Sauerland

Raymaekers

et al. 2015

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

show abstract

The Impact of Testing on the Formation of Children's and Adults' False Memories

Brackmann

Otgaar

Sauerland

et al. 2016

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryWitnesses are frequently questioned immediately following a crime. The effects of such testing on false recall are inconclusive: Testing may inoculate against subsequent misinformation or enhance false memory formation. We examined whether different types of processing can account for these discrepancies. Drawing from Fuzzy‐trace and Associative‐activation theories, immediate questions that trigger the processing of the global understanding of the event can heighten false memory rates. However, questions that trigger the processing of specific details can inoculate memories against subsequent misinformation. These effects were hypothesized to be more pronounced in children than in adults. Seven/eight‐, 11/12‐, 14/15‐year‐olds, and adults (N = 220) saw a mock‐theft film and were tested immediately with meaning or item‐specific questions. Test results on the succeeding day replicated classic misinformation and testing effects, although our processing hypothesis was not supported. Only adults who received meaning questions benefited from immediate testing and, across all ages, testing led to retrieval‐enhanced suggestibility. © 2016 The Authors. Applied Cognitive Psychology Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

Providing eyewitnesses with initial retrieval support: what works at immediate and subsequent recall?

Cited by 21 publications

References 44 publications

How effective is retrieval support for witnesses with different levels of working and source memory?

How effective is retrieval support for witnesses with different levels of working and source memory?

Eyewitness Evidence Obtained with the Self‐Administered Interview© Is Unaffected by Stress

The Impact of Testing on the Formation of Children's and Adults' False Memories

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About