2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2532-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing NHS staff with height-adjustable workstations and behaviour change strategies to reduce workplace sitting time: protocol for the Stand More AT (SMArT) Work cluster randomised controlled trial

Abstract: BackgroundHigh levels of sedentary behaviour (i.e., sitting) are a risk factor for poor health. With high levels of sitting widespread in desk-based office workers, office workplaces are an appropriate setting for interventions aimed at reducing sedentary behaviour. This paper describes the development processes and proposed intervention procedures of Stand More AT (SMArT) Work, a multi-component randomised control (RCT) trial which aims to reduce occupational sitting time in desk-based office workers within t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, results support the continued use of an index score based on all eight items. Past studies have used the 8-item WLQ to assess associations between health-related variables and work limitations [11,12,2932], determine cost estimates associated with poor health [10], and evaluate intervention effects [33]. Our findings provide additional support for results from these studies by providing evidence the 8-item WLQ is a valid and reliable measure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Furthermore, results support the continued use of an index score based on all eight items. Past studies have used the 8-item WLQ to assess associations between health-related variables and work limitations [11,12,2932], determine cost estimates associated with poor health [10], and evaluate intervention effects [33]. Our findings provide additional support for results from these studies by providing evidence the 8-item WLQ is a valid and reliable measure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The rationale for this was to reduce research wastage associated with unnecessary intervention development. Many developers reviewed the existing literature in the introduction section of articles to establish the need for a new intervention [40] or to identify effective interventions, or components of existing interventions, that might be adapted or used for a different health issue [52], target population [29], or setting [53]. In a small number of articles, developers began by exploring the health issue in more detail to identify contributory or causal processes or pathways before searching the literature for existing interventions, or components of interventions, to address these.…”
Section: Action 6: Review Published Evidence On Existing Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Behaviour Change Wheel [45] because they provided a systematic way of analysing behaviour and a comprehensive list of behaviour change techniques to consider [29,44]. The rationale for this was to bring transparency to the process of development and allow for accurate replication and evaluation of the intervention mechanisms [53,55].…”
Section: Action 7: Involve Stakeholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, with trends towards greater sitting in the workplace [5], office workers have been shown to engage in high levels of sitting [6]. The Stand More AT (SMArT) Work programme was an intervention tested in desk-based employees of an English East Midlands National Health Service (NHS) Trust [7][8][9]. A full study protocol is published [7], but, in brief, groups of desk-based staff within the same offices were randomised to either an intervention or control condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stand More AT (SMArT) Work programme was an intervention tested in desk-based employees of an English East Midlands National Health Service (NHS) Trust [7][8][9]. A full study protocol is published [7], but, in brief, groups of desk-based staff within the same offices were randomised to either an intervention or control condition. The intervention participants received a multi-component intervention designed to reduce workplace sitting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%