2016
DOI: 10.1177/155014774645256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing Privacy Protection and Personalization Awareness for Android Devices

Abstract: With an increasing number of applications appearing, smartphones with powerful processors and a variety of sensors are ideal mobile devices at hand. On one hand, various applications which are able to provide personalization functions that provide the service of interest to users rely on gathering and analyzing the sensor data and other sensitive information. On the other hand, attackers can accurately classify activities of mobile users from these data. As a result, the risk of users compromising their privac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research is discussed below. Other hypothesized predictors have included privacy management abilities (Dienlin & Metzger, 2016; Dienlin & Trepte, 2015; Epstein & Quinn, 2020), need for self-identity (Marwick & Boyd, 2011; Wu, 2019), attitude (Dienlin & Trepte, 2015; Epstein & Quinn, 2020), norms (Dienlin & Trepte, 2015), personality traits and intelligence (Nardis & Panek, 2019; Sindermann et al, 2021), privacy literacy (Desimpelaere et al, 2020), trust in online relationships (Aïmeur & Sahnoune, 2020), and background variables such as culture (Baruh et al, 2017; Liang et al, 2016), gender, and age (Baruh et al, 2017; Walrave et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This research is discussed below. Other hypothesized predictors have included privacy management abilities (Dienlin & Metzger, 2016; Dienlin & Trepte, 2015; Epstein & Quinn, 2020), need for self-identity (Marwick & Boyd, 2011; Wu, 2019), attitude (Dienlin & Trepte, 2015; Epstein & Quinn, 2020), norms (Dienlin & Trepte, 2015), personality traits and intelligence (Nardis & Panek, 2019; Sindermann et al, 2021), privacy literacy (Desimpelaere et al, 2020), trust in online relationships (Aïmeur & Sahnoune, 2020), and background variables such as culture (Baruh et al, 2017; Liang et al, 2016), gender, and age (Baruh et al, 2017; Walrave et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this recommendation, in the present study, we examined intentions to engage in privacy behavior on Twitter, a currently popular social networking site that serves as a platform for interpersonal communication as well as a microblogging platform (Marwick & Boyd, 2011) for mass communication (French & Bazarova, 2017). On Twitter, information is open to everyone unless users actively customize their privacy settings (Liang et al, 2016). Studying privacy behavior on this alternative platform has the potential to enrich our understanding of the processes underlying privacy behavior in a high-vulnerability environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%