“…This focus of this review was limited to evaluation reports and peer-reviewed publications that (1) reported on systematic data collection and (2) examined SARTs’ effectiveness and/or challenges faced. Therefore, the following types of publications were excluded: theoretical discussions of the SART model (Ferguson, 2006; Girardin, 2005; Ledray, 1999; Taylor, 2002; Voekler, 1996; five studies), descriptive studies or discussion of individual SARTs (e.g., Botello, King, & Ratner, 2003; Dandino-Abbott, 1999; Fulginiti et al, 1996; Hatmaker, Pinholster, & Saye, 2002; Johnston, 2005; Peterson et al, 2009; Smith, Holmseth, MacGregor, & Letourneau, 1998; Zajac 2006, 2009; nine studies), and articles that sought to provide information about sexual assault to SARTs (Archambault & Faugno, 2001; Ledray, 2001b; Nakajima, 2005; three studies). Additionally, articles that described what a SART is, how it should be structured or function and/or its potential benefits, but did not report on systematic data collection or evaluation were excluded.…”