2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing ranked cooperative query answers using the metricized knowledge abstraction hierarchy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cooperative query evaluation with negation operation: Most of the existing abstraction-based techniques [4,5,6,13,15] suffer from the problem of soundness when query contains negation operation M IN U S, because abstraction of the query appearing on right side of M IN U S may remove more information from the result of the query on left side of M IN U S, yielding to a result that does not satisfy the soundness. In this section, we discuss the way to treat negation operation so as to preserve the soundness.…”
Section: Lemma 1 Let S Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Cooperative query evaluation with negation operation: Most of the existing abstraction-based techniques [4,5,6,13,15] suffer from the problem of soundness when query contains negation operation M IN U S, because abstraction of the query appearing on right side of M IN U S may remove more information from the result of the query on left side of M IN U S, yielding to a result that does not satisfy the soundness. In this section, we discuss the way to treat negation operation so as to preserve the soundness.…”
Section: Lemma 1 Let S Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, none of these schemes enlightens the key issues: soundness, relevancy and optimality in the context of cooperativeness of the query answers. Most of the existing techniques [4,5,6,13,15] suffer from the problem of soundness when query contains negation operation MINUS. In case of conceptual or approximate queries where approximate results are desirable, none of the schemes focuses on the way to compute aggregate functions when appearing in a query so as to preserve the soundness.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some approaches have used taxonomies or ontologies for flexible query answering but did not consider their application for distributed storage of data: CoBase [26] used a type abstraction hierarchy to generalize values; Shin et al [27] use some specific notion of metric distance in a knowledge abstraction hierarchy to identify semantically related answers; Halder and Cortesi [28] define a partial order between cooperative answers based on their abstract interpretation framework; Muslea [29] discusses the relaxation of queries in disjunctive normal form. Ontology-based query relaxation has also been studied for non-relational data (like XML data in [30]).…”
Section: Flexible Query Answeringmentioning
confidence: 99%