2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing safe abortion services: Experiences and perspectives of providers in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While rape is one of the conditions abortion is lawfully permitted in most SSA countries, abortion services are not easily accessible in most SSA countries(51), and rape is di cult to prove when cases are not reported initially. In our study context, however, safe and legal abortion is available, but societal stigma precludes women from accessing abortion services (52)(53)(54)(55).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While rape is one of the conditions abortion is lawfully permitted in most SSA countries, abortion services are not easily accessible in most SSA countries(51), and rape is di cult to prove when cases are not reported initially. In our study context, however, safe and legal abortion is available, but societal stigma precludes women from accessing abortion services (52)(53)(54)(55).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Abortions in the second trimester (13-20 weeks) can only be performed by a doctor. Abortions are provided free of charge in public health care facilities designated to provide abortion care services [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second trimester abortions using the dilatation and evacuation method are available on a limited basis. Labor induction with misoprostol used alone is the current standard of care in South Africa for second trimester abortion [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a debate if CO be allowed in medical practice, but with an inconclusive opinion, with few in support of not allowing to safeguard patient's right, safety and other physician's right. [1][2][3][4] There is an argument that there is no place for CO in medical profession, particularly reproductive health. 5 There is a difference in global trend with certain countries (Sweden, Iceland, Finland, Bulgaria, and Czech Republic) not allowing CO; Italy allows CO but the medical practitioner has to register their objection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 There is a difference in global trend with certain countries (Sweden, Iceland, Finland, Bulgaria, and Czech Republic) not allowing CO; Italy allows CO but the medical practitioner has to register their objection. [2][3][4][5][6] Rate of CO varies between 15% (Australia) to 70% (Italy and Poland). 6,7 Majority of the countries follow a moderate path, allowing CO, but not during emergency and compromising patient safety.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%