Providing social assistance and humanitarian relief: The case for embracing uncertainty

Abstract

Motivation: Social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response increasingly overlap, especially where recurrent crises and persistent conflicts prevail. In such situations, distinctions between risk and uncertainty become especially important. It is critical for policy and practice to shift from focusing on risk assessment and management to embracing uncertainty. Purpose: The article assesses the appropriateness of two approaches to social assistance and humanitarian relief where crises recur and conflicts persist: risk assessment and management; and embracing uncertainty and ignorance. Methods and approach:The article reviews different approaches to social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, and asks how they are framed. It draws on experiences from programmes offering social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, highlighting the professional, bureaucratic, and institutional features that influence programme design and functioning. These are compared with "high-reliability" approaches deployed in other critical infrastructure-such as water and energy supply. Findings: Mainstream approaches focus on risk assessment and management, assuming predictability and stability. This is problematic, especially in settings of crisis and conflict where there may be no functioning delivery system for social assistance and relief. The article highlights alternatives to the mainstream risk-focused approaches, which emphasize learning, collaboration, adaptation, and flexibility. Such approaches must build on embedded practices of moral economy, collective action, and mutual care and be supported through professional and institutional capacities that generate reliability. Policy implications: The article suggests a new agenda for the intersection of social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, which makes uncertainty the focus for rethinking responses at scale, especially in settings affected by crisis and conflict.

Researching Capacities to Sustain Social Protection in Protracted Crises. Part 1: The Capacity Cube

“…The principle of the third dimension can be discerned in some research outputs. For example, Caravani et al (2021) argue for a focus on capacities on the ground where all manner of complications arise that must be navigated, which are not simply technical.…”

Zakat for Humanity in Disaster Mitigation

“…It will help prevent misunderstandings and ensure Zakat's assistance reaches those in need. With these measures in place, it is hoped that Zakat aid for disaster mitigation will be more effective in meeting the humanitarian needs of beneficiaries [95,96]. It aligns with the humanitarian principles that underpin Zakat management, where the primary goal is to assist those in need most efficiently and beneficially.…”

Conflict Disruptions to Social Assistance in a Multi-Hazard Context: Assessing Responses to the Northern Ethiopia Crisis (2020–22)

“…In this way, frontline workers come up with best guesses on what to do next, then test and correct in a continuous engagement and learning process' (Green and Guijt 2019: 18). Adaptive delivery is especially important in conflict settings, where systems require capacities to identify and address uncertainties, and avoid areas of ignorance (Caravani et al 2022). Even in a situation without conflict risks, as the previous section explains, there is a gathering sense among funders, senior programme officials, and frontline delivery personnel alike that the PSNP has become too complicated and unwieldy.…”