2018
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provincial-level cancer burden attributable to active and second-hand smoking in China

Abstract: BackgroundUnderstanding disparities in the burden of cancer attributable to smoking is crucial to inform and improve tobacco control measures. In this report, we estimate the population attributable fraction (PAF) of cancers deaths attributable to smoking at the national and provincial levels in China.MethodsUsing cancer mortality data from 978 counties, smoking data from a nationwide survey and relative risks from a prospective study of 0.5 million adults in China, we calculated the absolute (non-standardised… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our province-specific PAF estimates were comparable with those from the limited evidence available from previous studies in China based on similar methodology. In our study, estimates of provincial PAFs for smoking and cancer deaths in men were higher than the corresponding figures of a previous study 32 . This discrepancy can be primarily explained by different sources of smoking prevalence.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our province-specific PAF estimates were comparable with those from the limited evidence available from previous studies in China based on similar methodology. In our study, estimates of provincial PAFs for smoking and cancer deaths in men were higher than the corresponding figures of a previous study 32 . This discrepancy can be primarily explained by different sources of smoking prevalence.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…This discrepancy can be primarily explained by different sources of smoking prevalence. Our study used the smoking prevalence in 1998 as the exposure rate, which was higher than the figures of 2002 used in the Xia et al 32 study, based on a different assumption of the latency time. Although the smoking definitions were similar in both studies, there were some differences in how PAF values were estimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the 2015 China Adult Tobacco Survey, there are 316 million smokers in China, with a smoking rate of 27.7% for adults (52.1% for men and 2.7% for women). As estimated, the population attributable fraction of smoking and lung cancer death was 44.7% for men and 6.4% for women in 2014 6 . Studies showed that at least 20 pack-years of cigarette smoking is associated with around 2-fold increased risk of COPD 7 , and has a remarkable combined effect with hypertension on the risk of CVD-related mortality 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…GDP is the gross domestic product per capita of city i. Smoking prevalence and second-hand smoking prevalence in non-smokers were obtained from the Chinese National Nutrition and Health Survey (NNHS) 14,15 . The proportion of residents older than 65, population and population density of city i were extracted from census data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%