2019
DOI: 10.1086/704190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provincializing Progress: Developmentalism and Anti-Imperialism in Colonial India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Development that relies on capitalism is by its very nature, sustained by ‘domination and imperialism’ (Marwah, 2019: 498). Developmentality, write Srinivasan and Kasturirangan (2016: 125) is a model ‘centred around consumption fuelled economic growth and surplus accumulation, has depended on the intensive exploitation of people and nature, thereby adversely impacting societies and ecologies throughout the planet.’ Capitalism relies on the systemic exploitation of sociopolitical differences and hierarchies between people, and notably, also the difference in geographic spatialisms, particularly maximising the urban/rural binary for profit (Potts, 2019).…”
Section: Site and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development that relies on capitalism is by its very nature, sustained by ‘domination and imperialism’ (Marwah, 2019: 498). Developmentality, write Srinivasan and Kasturirangan (2016: 125) is a model ‘centred around consumption fuelled economic growth and surplus accumulation, has depended on the intensive exploitation of people and nature, thereby adversely impacting societies and ecologies throughout the planet.’ Capitalism relies on the systemic exploitation of sociopolitical differences and hierarchies between people, and notably, also the difference in geographic spatialisms, particularly maximising the urban/rural binary for profit (Potts, 2019).…”
Section: Site and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They join longstanding critiques in literary studies (Said 1978;Spivak 1999), history (Chakrabarty 2000), philosophy (Dussel 1980;Mignolo 2011), and postcolonial theory (Nandy 1994;Chatterjee 1986) demonstrating how Euro-American theory secures its "positional superiority" (Said 1978, 7) by portraying the west as the pinnacle of a fixed process of historical evolution. More or less deterministic theorizations of social progress shape the conjectural histories of Smith, Ferguson, Robertson, and Kames (Pitts 2005;Sebastiani 2008;Meek 1976), those of their more critical continental counterparts, such as Lahontan, Turgot, Rousseau, and Diderot (Muthu 2003;Israel 2006), Kant's, Herder's, and Hegel's philosophical histories (Marwah 2021;Church 2022), eighteenth-and nineteenth-century liberalism-most notoriously, in the Mills and Tocqueville (Pitts 2005;Mehta 1999)-and conservatism (O'Neill 2016), Marx's historical materialism (Chakrabarty 2000;Anderson 2010), and twentieth-century modernization theory (McCarthy 2009). For all their variations, these developmentalisms consistently depict European modernity as the endpoint of a singular, universal course of progress.…”
Section: The Dilemma Of Developmentalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this political imaginary, nationalism was neither reactive nor restricted to the confines of the subcontinent. It was, rather, the spark for global metamorphoses ranging from the world-historical transition beyond European hegemony envisioned by Ghose (Marwah 2019), to Krishna Varma's Pan-Asian Parliament and "alliance of England's oppressed" (Fischer-Tiné 2014; Ramnath 2011), to M.N. Roy's Indo-communist revolutionism (Manjapra 2010).…”
Section: Conscious Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, developmentalism has served as a recurrent example of an intractably Eurocentric conceptual field that derives from a range of Western, post-Enlightenment political vocabularies. Rather than accept that developmental thought is prima facie Eurocentric given these historical entanglements, I join recent work examining anticolonial developmental discourses in their more specific political and intellectual contexts (Marwah 2019; Sultan 2020).…”
Section: What Is Decolonizing Political Theory?mentioning
confidence: 99%