2017
DOI: 10.1215/18752160-3823859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provincializing Sts: Postcoloniality, Symmetry, and Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this paper goes one step further; following Law and Lin (2015) when they draw on STS to argue 'for forms of postcolonial investigation that use non-Western analytical resources. Their major concern is to ask 'what might happen if STS were to make more systematic use of non-Western ideas ' (2015, n.p.).…”
Section: Rain Of the Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this paper goes one step further; following Law and Lin (2015) when they draw on STS to argue 'for forms of postcolonial investigation that use non-Western analytical resources. Their major concern is to ask 'what might happen if STS were to make more systematic use of non-Western ideas ' (2015, n.p.).…”
Section: Rain Of the Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also prompted intense transdisciplinary and crosscultural debate (Kuo 2017). 7 It has further prompted a recognition by Lin (2016, n.p., 2017) that method is emphatically 'provincial' or local, not universal (Law and Lin 2015). Also, that utilising shi (勢), for instance, suggests 'the idea of 'truth' is displaced by something akin to 'efficacy' (gōng xiào, 功效)' with important implications for how academic work is performed (Law and Lin 2016, n.p.…”
Section: Asksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To debate this, I consider the contribution of Lin and Law's types of knowledge and their proposal about STS method, both with flawed arguments due to the confusion between social and epistemic levels of analysis. I will begin by summarizing Bloor's contribution and then I will refer to Lin and Law's works to discuss two issues: one related to a classification of East Asian STS practices presented in Lin and Law (2018), and the other related to the proposed method of enlarging the canon, and promoting inter-contextual dialogues (Law and Lin 2017). Regarding the first issue, I will give examples from Latin America in order to discuss problems with the symmetry principle in standard STS approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our ambition is to generate knowledge about more dynamic, messy expressions of civil society, paying attention not only to the material conditions for organizing, but to the frictions in the connections and relations between organizations and to alternative communities and struggles going on outside the organizations. Another, even more important ambition is to find approaches and methods that do not reproduce one-directional narratives (Law & Lin 2015). Postcolonial scholars have criticized NGOs and feminist scholars from the North and West for reiterating Western colonial meta-narratives, for example the notion that women's rights, gender equality and sexual rights has its origin in the West and is then diffused out into the world, from the centre to the periphery (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%