Provision of injectable contraceptives by community health workers in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of safety, acceptability and effectiveness

Abstract

Background Injectable contraceptives are the most popular method of contraception in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), but their availability in clinical settings has been severely limited, despite the scarcity of health care providers and limited access to health facilities. WHO and USAID have endorsed the community-based distribution of injectable contraceptives as a promising option for improving access to family planning services and expanding the method mix for women who want to limit the number of births. Studies have shown that community health workers (CHWs) can provide women with injectable contraceptives that meet acceptable quality standards. The goal of this study is to identify, evaluate and synthesize evidence supporting the use of community-based administration of injectable contraceptives in SSA. Methods This review's guidance was based on a previously developed protocol. Nine international electronic databases and the websites of organizations known to support community-based reproductive health initiatives in SSA were searched systemically. Experts in this area were also contacted for the identification of unpublished literature and ongoing studies. The reference lists of eligible studies were reviewed. The Effective Public Practice Project tool was used to assess the quality and risk of bias in eligible studies. Data were extracted and analysed using a custom data extraction form and a narrative synthesis. Results The search strategy identified a total of 1358 studies with 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. One unpublished study was provided by an expert making a total of 13 studies. The results showed that irrespective of the study designs, well-trained CHWs can competently administer injectable contraceptives safely and community-based delivery of injectable contraceptives is acceptable in SSA. Also, the use of community health workers in the provision of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate expanded access to inhabitants of hard-to-reach areas and led to an overall uptake of injectable contraceptives as well as family planning. Studies that compared CHWs to clinic-based providers revealed equivalent or higher levels of performance in favour of CHWs. Conclusions The CHWs can competently provide injectable contraceptives within SSA communities if appropriately trained and supervised. Hence, SSA policymakers should give this initiative due consideration as a way of improving access to family planning services.

Predictors of cessation of exclusive breastfeeding according to the Cox regression model: survey of mothers of children aged 6-12 months, Thiès, Senegal

“…The low rate of EBF is comparable to the national average found in 2017 (42%) [ 6 ], 2018 (46%) [ 14 ] and 2019 (41%) [ 15 ]. In contrast, the median duration of EBF, i.e.…”

“…In contrast, the median duration of EBF, i.e. the point at which half of the children stopped being exclusively breastfed, is higher than those estimated in 2017 and 2018; at 2 (DHS 2017) and 2.6 months (DHS 2018) [ 6 , 14 ] respectively. This difference could be explained by the methodology used.…”

Task shifting and community engagement as the keys to increasing access to modern contraception: Findings from mixed methods operational research in coastal Kenya

“…Task shifting and community‐based provision of the injectable has been piloted and widely implemented in a variety of settings 20–24 . A systematic review found that across studies conducted in African countries, provision of the injectable by CHWs was generally safe, acceptable, and effective, but the authors noted a need for more high quality research, including qualitative studies 25 . A pilot study of CHV provision of the injectable was conducted in Kenya in 2009–2010 and contributed to the policy change to broadly allow these health workers to provide the injectable in hard‐to‐reach areas 26 .…”

“…[20][21][22][23][24] A systematic review found that across studies conducted in African countries, provision of the injectable by CHWs was generally safe, acceptable, and effective, but the authors noted a need for more high quality research, including qualitative studies. 25 A pilot study of CHV provision of the injectable was conducted in Kenya in 2009-2010 and contributed to the policy change to broadly allow these health workers to provide the injectable in hard-to-reach areas. 26 While we found no significant association with overall provision of the injectable, it is possible that as a result of the intervention some people shifted from obtaining the injectable from a health facility to obtaining it from a CHEW.…”

Task shifting and task sharing in the health sector in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence, success indicators, challenges, and opportunities

“…Effectiveness of task shifting and sharing - evidence from the literature: task shifting and sharing have been successfully used to improve health in various settings and times, including the COVID-19 pandemic, to address global health workforce shortages and inadequate access to care for critical health issues [ 4 , 14 - 17 ]. Some studies have shown that task sharing and shifting are efficient and effective methods for assisting healthcare workers in completing duties not previously within their purview and increasing human resource for health (HRH) and quality outcomes [ 14 - 18 ]. For instance, Amani et al .…”