1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb04814.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provocation tests with allergens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
1
73
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the specific NPT is the method of choice for the reproducibility of the allergic reaction, and it is indicated when discrepancies arise in the assessment of a patient's medical history and the results of skin and/or serological tests, as reviewed by several authors (Litvyakova LI & Baraniuk JN. 2001;Loureiro, 2001;Dordal et al, 2011;Mellilo, 1997;Naclerio & Norman, 1998 …”
Section: Allergic Rhinitismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, the specific NPT is the method of choice for the reproducibility of the allergic reaction, and it is indicated when discrepancies arise in the assessment of a patient's medical history and the results of skin and/or serological tests, as reviewed by several authors (Litvyakova LI & Baraniuk JN. 2001;Loureiro, 2001;Dordal et al, 2011;Mellilo, 1997;Naclerio & Norman, 1998 …”
Section: Allergic Rhinitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first allergen challenge was performed in 1873, by Blackley, who elicited a nasal response after an application of fresh pollen to the membrane of his own nostrils (Blackley, 1873). After this first NPT, several consensus and guidelines have been published trying to achieve a better diagnostic approach of allergic disease and its knowledge (Dordal et al, 2011;Druce & Schumacher, 1990;Gosepath et al, 2005;Litvyakova & Baraniuk, 2001Lund et al, 1994;Malm et al, 2000;Mellilo et al, 1997;Schumacher, 1992).…”
Section: Nasal Provocation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These tests, performed on a certain organ, may definitely (1) confirm the existence of an allergic component in the particular and/or related organ(s); (2) demonstrate that a certain allergen causes indeed a certain response type in the particular organ, which can be measured quantitatively in its dynamic course; (3) to confirm the causal role of an allergic reaction occurring initially in one organ, in the secondarily induced response of another organ 7,9,10,26,[38][39][40][41] The conjunctival provocation tests with allergens are a suitable technique to demonstrate the primary conjunctival/keratoconjunctival responses resulting from direct exposure of the ocular tissue to an external allergen. 4,11,16,17,20,25,33,35,36,38,[42][43][44] However, they are unable to detect conjunctival/keratoconjunctival responses induced secondarily by an allergic reaction occurring initially in the nasal mucosa. These responses can only be detected by the NPT with allergens, in combination with registration of ocular features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10]16,23,26 However, the involvement of the individual cell types in the allergic reaction can only be evaluated by comparing their counts and their conditions before and repeatedly after a well-defined intervention, which is an allergen challenge. [7][8][9][10]12,14,16,26,27,34,35,38 Keratoconjunctival response-cytologic changes in tears Z Pelikan…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%