1982
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198210000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal Femoral Fractures Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
1
12

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
79
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, 75% of patients with periprosthetic fractures had prefracture radiographic evidence of loosening of the implant [5]. In a recent study, 70% of stems were considered loose when the patient sustained the periprosthetic fracture [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one study, 75% of patients with periprosthetic fractures had prefracture radiographic evidence of loosening of the implant [5]. In a recent study, 70% of stems were considered loose when the patient sustained the periprosthetic fracture [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most consistently mentioned predisposing factors is aseptic loosening of the femoral component. One study reported that 75% (22 of 35) of their patients had prefracture evidence of femoral component loosening [5]. Another study reported almost 50% of their patients had evidence of femoral component loosening as did other groups [11,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obviously more relevant to consider the presence of prosthetic loosening. Classification based on the relationship between the prosthetic tip and the medullary cavity (Johansson et al 1981) does not seem justified for clinical use; neither does the system used in other series (Bethea et al 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoral fracture after arthroplasty is rare; only small materials have been reported ( Johansson et al 1981, Bethea et al 1982, and the outcome seems rather poor (Johansson et al 1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous classification schemes and treatment algorithms for periprosthetic femur fractures focused primarily on location, fracture pattern, implant stability, and/or potential for loosening [2,7,13,18,21]. The Vancouver classification assimilates three key factors: location, stability of the implant, and the surrounding bone stock ( Table 1).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%