2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal sensor data fusion and auxiliary information for tropical soil property prediction: Soil texture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best prediction models were achieved using the random forest (5 times), cubist regression (3 times), support vector machine (2 times), and projection pursuit regression (1 time) algorithms. The random forest algorithm has proven to be very robust for soil nutrient prediction [ 16 , 19 , 33 ], and also for other soil attributes such as particle size distribution [ 18 ] and fertility [ 20 , 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The best prediction models were achieved using the random forest (5 times), cubist regression (3 times), support vector machine (2 times), and projection pursuit regression (1 time) algorithms. The random forest algorithm has proven to be very robust for soil nutrient prediction [ 16 , 19 , 33 ], and also for other soil attributes such as particle size distribution [ 18 ] and fertility [ 20 , 34 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categorical validation showed the practical performance of the prediction models while considering the nutrient status classes. Classification models constitute an elegant solution to compensate for datasets with many outliers, or when only a mixed dataset (composed of both categorical and numerical information) is available [ 16 , 18 ]. In this sense, even B and Mg that obtained poor R 2 values (0.33 and 0.49, respectively) could be reasonably and well predicted, respectively, using categorical modeling (B, overall accuracy = 0.63, and Mg, overall accuracy = 0.70).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Models that included pXRF data (alone or combined) presented the best scores (R 2 > 0.80). Likewise, Andrade et al (2022) tested a similar approach with 464 samples in Brazil and also achieved R 2 scores > 0.80 for all texture fractions using models including pXRF data alone or combined with Vis-NIR data. pXRF was more effective in predicting soil texture (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%