2012
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2010.529121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity and the Evolution of Collaboration Networks: Evidence from Research and Development Projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
314
0
29

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(381 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
12
314
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the high variance in databases, levels of analysis and estimation methods, the economic literature on research networks financed under the EU Framework programmes (Autant-Bernard et al 2007;Balland 2012;Caloghirou et al 2004;Breschi and Cusmano 2004;Protogerou et al 2010;Lata and Scherngell 2010;Barber 2009, 2011) shows the existence of an oligopolistic structure in which a restricted number of institution localized in central, high-income regions play a major role along a core-periphery pattern. Thus, we can expect the interregional network structure also to be heavily influenced by the spatial distribution of members and coordinators in the different European regions.…”
Section: Rq1: Does Each Of the Theoretically Imposed Layouts At The Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the high variance in databases, levels of analysis and estimation methods, the economic literature on research networks financed under the EU Framework programmes (Autant-Bernard et al 2007;Balland 2012;Caloghirou et al 2004;Breschi and Cusmano 2004;Protogerou et al 2010;Lata and Scherngell 2010;Barber 2009, 2011) shows the existence of an oligopolistic structure in which a restricted number of institution localized in central, high-income regions play a major role along a core-periphery pattern. Thus, we can expect the interregional network structure also to be heavily influenced by the spatial distribution of members and coordinators in the different European regions.…”
Section: Rq1: Does Each Of the Theoretically Imposed Layouts At The Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research on network evolution confirms the plausible expectation that new relations are more likely to emerge in geographical proximity than over large distance (Broekel & Boschma, 2012;Glückler, 2010;Powell, White, Koput, & Owen-Smith, 2005). Recent research in evolutionary economic geography has underscored the association between geographical proximity and tie formation in networks by empirically controlling for other forms of proximity (Balland, 2012). These and other accounts of geographical constraints of network formation and evolution form part of what Borgatti and Halgin (2011) would classify as geographical theories of networks.…”
Section: Space As a Condition For Network Formationmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Throughout informal meetings this has an important role in the inter-local cooperation. Balland [11] described the physical distance as WKH µVLPSOHVW ¶ IRUP RI DQDO\VLQJ WKH VSDWLDO SUR[LPLW\ Furthermore, spatial proximity also refers to the political boundaries between the different actors, e.g. district or regional boundaries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%