2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61505-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity Arteriography: Cost-effectiveness in Asymptomatic Penetrating Extremity Trauma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The angiogram has been considered the gold standard, with a sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 97%, but is now rarely used in the evaluation of penetrating trauma without hard signs of vascular injury (19). This has occurred because up to 95% of these arteriograms were negative and management decisions changed in only 1.3% of patients with no clinical findings (7,20).…”
Section: Other Diagnostic Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angiogram has been considered the gold standard, with a sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 97%, but is now rarely used in the evaluation of penetrating trauma without hard signs of vascular injury (19). This has occurred because up to 95% of these arteriograms were negative and management decisions changed in only 1.3% of patients with no clinical findings (7,20).…”
Section: Other Diagnostic Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the diagnosis of arterial injury related to trauma to an extremity (Fig 3) the cost-effectiveness analyses considered in two studies (14,15) were observation, surgical exploration, and angiography. Unfortunately, the authors of neither study considered minimally invasive or noninvasive tests such as multidetector row CT angiography, MR angiography, or duplex US.…”
Section: Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,4] Although rapid detection, localization and specification of a vascular injury in these patients are essential for the effective management of PUET, it is ill-advised to perform diagnostic computed tomography angiography (CTA) or conventional angiography in every patient. [5][6][7] Over 90% of CTAs in these patients will be negative, representing a large cost as a screening tool. [7] ORIGINAL ARTICLE Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, September 2013, Vol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] Over 90% of CTAs in these patients will be negative, representing a large cost as a screening tool. [7] ORIGINAL ARTICLE Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, September 2013, Vol. 19, No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation