2011 26th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2011) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ase.2011.6100088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity based weighting of test cases to improve spectrum based fault localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an intuition is conceived by some extended SBFL techniques. For example, both Baah et al [2010] and Bandyopadhyay and Ghosh [2011] chose formula Ochiai in their studies, because of its empirically good performance. Naish et al [2009] have applied their weighting factors in different formulas, but interestingly, the performance comparison results of these formulas with weighting factors are consistent with the results without weighting factors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an intuition is conceived by some extended SBFL techniques. For example, both Baah et al [2010] and Bandyopadhyay and Ghosh [2011] chose formula Ochiai in their studies, because of its empirically good performance. Naish et al [2009] have applied their weighting factors in different formulas, but interestingly, the performance comparison results of these formulas with weighting factors are consistent with the results without weighting factors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some extended SBFL techniques have emerged, which integrate the basic procedure with other models or employ additional information, such as the SBFL with causal inference using program dependence graphs by Baah et al [2010], some weighted SBFL techniques using additional information from either passed test case or failed test case as weighting factors by Bandyopadhyay and Ghosh [2011], and by Naish et al [2009], etc. However, no matter how SBFL is extended, selecting a wellperformed risk evaluation formula is always the most fundamental and essential task.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, Wong et al [25,26] reported that the contribution of the failing test cases in computing its suspiciousness value is larger than or equal to that of the passing test cases. Bandyopadhyay and Ghosh [27] proposed a method to improve the efficiency of spectrum-based fault localization by incorporating the relative importance of different test cases in the calculation of suspiciousness values. Therefore, in the following, we will further study how to assign different weights of failing and the passing test cases in the similarity coefficients.…”
Section: Coverage-combined Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work [13], we proposed an approach to assign weights to test cases, based on an extension of the nearest neighbor model. The weight of a test case represents its importance in fault localization.…”
Section: A Coincidental Correctnessmentioning
confidence: 99%