2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.100.035426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity-induced gap in nanowires with a thin superconducting shell

Abstract: Coupling a normal metal wire to a superconductor induces an excitation gap ∆ ind in the normal metal. In the absence of disorder, the induced excitation gap is strongly suppressed by finite-size effects if the thickness DS of the superconductor is much smaller than the thickness DN of the normal metal and the superconducting coherence length ξ. We show that the presence of disorder, either in the bulk or at the exposed surface of the superconductor, significantly enhances the magnitude of ∆ ind , such that ∆ i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is justified by the small effective transparency of the interface for quasiparticles traveling from the superconductor into the semiconductor: quasiparticles in the superconductor have a much larger Fermi momentum than in the semiconductor. Only quasiparticles moving with a small momentum parallel to the interface can tunnel from the superconductor to the semiconductor, but strong disorder in the superconductor randomizes the momentum direction, resulting in a low-probability of tunneling [46]. Note that electrons from the semiconductor have a high probability of tunneling into the superconductor and reflecting back as a hole, providing Andreev scattering.…”
Section: A Usadel Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is justified by the small effective transparency of the interface for quasiparticles traveling from the superconductor into the semiconductor: quasiparticles in the superconductor have a much larger Fermi momentum than in the semiconductor. Only quasiparticles moving with a small momentum parallel to the interface can tunnel from the superconductor to the semiconductor, but strong disorder in the superconductor randomizes the momentum direction, resulting in a low-probability of tunneling [46]. Note that electrons from the semiconductor have a high probability of tunneling into the superconductor and reflecting back as a hole, providing Andreev scattering.…”
Section: A Usadel Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if the proximity effect is strong, the bulk superconductor 'metallizes' the semiconducting nanostructure, bringing its parameters closer to the metal values with strongly reduced SOI and g-factors. [214][215][216][217][218] Moreover, due to screening, it is challenging to control the position of the chemical potential in order to tune it to the 'sweet spot'. Thus, future experiments need to find ways to avoid or reduce such metallization effects on the semiconductors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and is constructed out of the tunneling matrix elements t 1 = t 2 in N 1 and N 2 and the tunneling matrix element t S in S. We define the Heaviside function Θ(n) with Θ(0) = 1/2 throughout. The difference between the tunneling matrix elements of the superconducting and the normal sections arises due to the mass renormalization inside the superconducting section caused by metallization effects induced by the thin superconducting shell [72][73][74][75][76][77]. The chemical potential has a similar structure…”
Section: A Non-topological Nanowirementioning
confidence: 99%