2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.97.224509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity-reduced range of internal phase differences in double Josephson junctions with closely spaced interfaces

Abstract: A substantial influence of the proximity and pair breaking effects on the range of internal phase differences is shown to take place in symmetric double Josephson junctions with closely spaced interfaces and to affect the evolution of the supercurrent j with the changing central lead's length L. If the phase difference φ between the external leads is controlled and L exceeds a few coherence lengths, the regime of interchanging modes is established. The range of the phase differences across the two individual i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase relations in the SINIS systems do not result in the regime of interchanging modes with abrupt supercurrent changes, that can occur in SISIS junctions. [37][38][39] The small values of the order parameter and supercurrent, that are characteristic for the second solution and marked with crosses in Figs. 3 and 4, are specifically associated with the choice g ℓ = 0.01 for the Josephson coupling constant, taken for demonstrating a quantitative agreement between the numerical and approximate analytical results.…”
Section: The Order Parameter Fmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The phase relations in the SINIS systems do not result in the regime of interchanging modes with abrupt supercurrent changes, that can occur in SISIS junctions. [37][38][39] The small values of the order parameter and supercurrent, that are characteristic for the second solution and marked with crosses in Figs. 3 and 4, are specifically associated with the choice g ℓ = 0.01 for the Josephson coupling constant, taken for demonstrating a quantitative agreement between the numerical and approximate analytical results.…”
Section: The Order Parameter Fmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For superconducting leads real roots usually take nonnegative values t i ≥ 0 (i = 1, 2, 3). 2,3 For the proximity influenced normal metal lead only one of the real roots is nonnegative: t 1 ≥ 0, t 2,3 ≤ 0, as ensured by the sign minus and sign plus on the right hand sides of the first and second equations in (S9), respectively. The sign minus originates from the condition a n > 0 for the normal metal.…”
Section: S1 Symmetric Solutions To the Gl Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, under the opposite condition L ξ, the proximity and interface pair breaking can have a strong effect on the transport processes, including the Josephson current. Static and dynamic interactions of two closely spaced Josephson junctions can manifest in a variety of properties of mesoscopic superconducting heterostructures and play an important role in superconducting electronics [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter approach substantially simplifies the solution and, in a variety of cases, can be justified. However, an implicit assumption of such a standard approximation is the one-to-one correspondence between the external φ and internal χ 1,2 phase differences, which recently has been demonstrated to be invalid under certain conditions in the double and multiple junctions [19,20,40]. The one-to-one correspondence gets broken in the SINIS and SISIS superconducting double junctions under two qualitatively different scenarios characteristic of the behavior of internal phase differences driven by the external phase difference and influenced by the proximity and pair breaking effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%