Whereas kinesin I is designed to transport cargoes long distances in isolation, a closely related kinesin motor, Eg5, is designed to generate a sustained opposing force necessary for proper mitotic spindle formation. Do the very different roles for these evolutionarily related motors translate into differences in how they generate movement? We have addressed this question by examining when in the ATPase cycle the Eg5 motor domain and neck linker move through the use of a series of novel spectroscopic probes utilizing fluorescence resonance energy transfer, and we have compared our results to kinesin I. Our results are consistent with a model in which movement in Eg5 occurs in two sequential steps, an ATP-dependent docking of the neck linker, followed by a rotation or "rolling" of the entire motor domain on the microtubule surface that occurs with ATP hydrolysis. These two forms of movement are consistent with the functions of a motor designed to generate sustained opposing force, and hence, our findings support the argument that the mechanochemical features of a molecular motor are shaped more by the demands placed on it than by its particular family of origin.The last decade has witnessed a marked advance in our understanding of how molecular motors generate force and movement (1-6). Studies of both myosins and kinesins have revealed a variety of conserved structural elements that play key roles in mechanochemical transduction. These include switch I, switch II, and the P loop located within the catalytic site (3,5,6). Movements of these elements during ATP binding, hydrolysis, and product release lead to a series of conformational changes that are transmitted ultimately to the "business end" of the motor, the mechanical element that produces force and movement. In kinesin I, this mechanical element consists of an extended peptide sequence with variable conformation and flexibility, called the "neck linker" (2, 3). Spectroscopic and kinetic studies have led to a convincing model in which the neck linker assumes a random coil in the absence of nucleotide. ATP binding to the active site causes the neck linker to dock along a hydrophobic surface in the motor (7-10). This process, which is very rapid (Ͼ800 s Ϫ1 ) at room temperature, immobilizes the neck linker and effectively "throws" the tethered head of a kinesin dimer forward, toward the next tubulin-docking site (11,12,25). Variable flexibility and ATP-induced docking are features of the kinesin I neck linker that are well suited to the physiologic role of this motor as a transport engine. Variable flexibility in the neck linker of the tethered head allows it to undergo a diffusive search for the next microtubule-docking site, whereas ATP-induced docking of the neck linker of the attached head helps position the tethered head in a forward position and reduces the probability of backward stepping (10,(13)(14)(15)(16). Thus, the physiologic requirements placed on a transport motor like kinesin I translate into structural features of its mechanical element that s...