2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PSA model with consideration of the effect of fault-tolerant techniques in digital I&C systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But in fact, DCS failure and maintenance process do not fully obey the exponential distribution. In addition, with the increase of the number of components, the number of state space of Markov model increases exponentially, and the model becomes extremely large, leading to the difficulty of calculation [8].The NUREG/CR-6901 report compared analogue and digital I&C systems and described the problems that need to be solved by modelling the reliability of digital I&C systems and embedding the reliability of digital I&C systems into the existing PRA model in order to increase the contribution of digital I&C systems to power plant risk informed decision making [9].This report summarized the reliability modelling methods of digital systems, and the comparison results of various methods show that none of the reliability modelling methods can completely meet the reliability modeling requirements of digital systems [10][11][12][13][14]. Guo of Tsinghua University used a variety of methods to analyze the reliability of digital I&C systems in NPPs, including failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), failure tree method (FT), dynamic flow graph mode (DFM) and Markov/CCMT (Cell-to-Cell Mapping Technique) to analyze the digital I&C systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in fact, DCS failure and maintenance process do not fully obey the exponential distribution. In addition, with the increase of the number of components, the number of state space of Markov model increases exponentially, and the model becomes extremely large, leading to the difficulty of calculation [8].The NUREG/CR-6901 report compared analogue and digital I&C systems and described the problems that need to be solved by modelling the reliability of digital I&C systems and embedding the reliability of digital I&C systems into the existing PRA model in order to increase the contribution of digital I&C systems to power plant risk informed decision making [9].This report summarized the reliability modelling methods of digital systems, and the comparison results of various methods show that none of the reliability modelling methods can completely meet the reliability modeling requirements of digital systems [10][11][12][13][14]. Guo of Tsinghua University used a variety of methods to analyze the reliability of digital I&C systems in NPPs, including failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), failure tree method (FT), dynamic flow graph mode (DFM) and Markov/CCMT (Cell-to-Cell Mapping Technique) to analyze the digital I&C systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the application of a dynamic method needs substantial effort and the method generally suffers from the incompatibility with the existing PSA framework. On this viewpoint, the ET/FT method that has a mature theory and is easy-to-use got much attention and had been used in research about reliability assessments of digital systems in NPPs and yielded satisfactory results [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To model common failure causes between components in digital systems, traditional probabilistic safety assessments (PSA) methods have been presented by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) (Chu, Martinez-Guridi, Yeu, Lehner, and Samanta, 2008). The PSA methods have been applied to model reliability of the digital system of feedwater control systems (Chu, Yeu, Martinez-Guridi, Mernick, Lehner, and Kuritzky, 2009) and nuclear safety-related digital instrumentation and control systems (Shi, Enzinna, Yang, and Blodgett, 2010, Authen and Holmberg, 2012, Bjorkman, Lahtinen, Tyrvainen, and Holmberg, 2015, Lee, Jung, and Yang, 2016. In addition to the conventional approaches to model reliability, prognosis of DIO modules is emerging to predict the reliability of complex automation systems accurately based on systems' conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%