“…In light of the above discussion, [11,Propositon 4.10] can not be valid. In other words, when 1 (S) is pseudo-amenable, then by [11,Proposition 3.5], S is amenable (not finite) and in general case, amenability of S does not imply amenability or character amenability of 1 (S). This happen when, S is an abelian or left (right) cancellative unital semigroup.…”