2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00707-016-1616-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudo-laminarization effect of several types of surfactant solutions in small-sized pipe flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases of inner tube diameters, friction factors in the turbulent flow region lay on the extension lines of those in the laminar flow region. These results indicate that Sample C solution maintained pseudo‐laminar flow in the turbulent flow region, which caused DR effect. Friction factors saturated at different values in the higher Reynolds number region when the inner tube diameter was 8 and 13 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In all cases of inner tube diameters, friction factors in the turbulent flow region lay on the extension lines of those in the laminar flow region. These results indicate that Sample C solution maintained pseudo‐laminar flow in the turbulent flow region, which caused DR effect. Friction factors saturated at different values in the higher Reynolds number region when the inner tube diameter was 8 and 13 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Especially, Hidema et al reported that the Sample C solution and slurry behave as non‐Newtonian fluids . Some researchers applied the generalized Reynolds number to characterize the non‐Newtonian flow of the surfactant solutions . Based on the power‐law model (Equation ), the generalized Reynolds number, Re * (–), is defined by Equation .…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is limited knowledge on fluid transport in small-sized flow fields (≤1.0 mm). Meanwhile, Ushida et al reported pseudo-laminarization by adding micellar solutions and dilute polymer solutions [22,23], and they reported that the rheological properties (first normal stress differences) exhibited pseudo-laminarization. However, pseudo-laminarization by microbubble mixtures without rheological properties must be considered from a different perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%