1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02510253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudo-symplectic Runge-Kutta methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The condition (1.4) forces the symplectic RungeKutta method (1.3) to be implicit. In the interest of computation efficiency, Aubry and Chartier investigated pseudo-symplectic Runge-Kutta methods, which are explicit and conserve the symplectic structure to a certain order [1]. We also note the closely related work in [2], where the error estimate for the Lie-Poisson structure is established for integration of Lie-Poisson systems using the midpoint rule.…”
Section: ∂H(pq) ∂Q Q(t) =mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The condition (1.4) forces the symplectic RungeKutta method (1.3) to be implicit. In the interest of computation efficiency, Aubry and Chartier investigated pseudo-symplectic Runge-Kutta methods, which are explicit and conserve the symplectic structure to a certain order [1]. We also note the closely related work in [2], where the error estimate for the Lie-Poisson structure is established for integration of Lie-Poisson systems using the midpoint rule.…”
Section: ∂H(pq) ∂Q Q(t) =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this note, we take a different approach from [1]. Successive approximation based upon the Contraction Mapping Principle is often used to obtain an approximate solution to y i in (1.3).…”
Section: ∂H(pq) ∂Q Q(t) =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Aubry and Chartier in [1] have studied the existence and construction of explicit RK methods with standard order p and ps-order 2 p, the methods derived by these authors are natural candidates in our search of QFI-conservation methods. The paper is organized as follows: In Section 2 we derive the h-power series expansion of Q(ψ h, f (y 0 )) − Q(y 0 ) in terms of bilinear forms of the elementary differentials of f (y) at y 0 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23,24] explicit methods have been proposed, which preserve the symplecticity with the accuracy higher than the accuracy of the numerical solution itself. In the following section, we present the results of a comparative study of solving Equation (16) by the Runge-Kutta (RK) method of order four and by the pseudo-symplectic method PS36 [23] that has the third-order accuracy of the numerical solution and the sixth-order accuracy in preserving the simplecticity of the system. These test calculations demonstrate the effectiveness of using pseudo-symplectic integrators for solving the problem considered here.…”
Section: Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%