2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2007.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudocompactness of hyperspaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that since A α+1 ∈ p for each α, p − lim g α exists, therefore p − lim F exists. By combining the above lemma and Theorem 3.2, we get Theorem 3.2 of [7], which states that under p = c, CL(Ψ(A)) is pseudocompact for every mad family A.…”
Section: Proof We Apply Theorem 22 By Lettingmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notice that since A α+1 ∈ p for each α, p − lim g α exists, therefore p − lim F exists. By combining the above lemma and Theorem 3.2, we get Theorem 3.2 of [7], which states that under p = c, CL(Ψ(A)) is pseudocompact for every mad family A.…”
Section: Proof We Apply Theorem 22 By Lettingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Therefore, CL(X) is not pseudocompact. Theorem 3.2 may also be used to give a simpler proof of Theorem 3.2 of [7] as we will see, that states that under p = c, CL(Ψ(A)) is pseudocompact for every mad family A. S. Shelah and M. Malliaris have recently proved that p = t ([10]), however, we avoid the complicated model theoretic proof of p = t. Lemma 3.7. For every mad family A, ω t is relatively countably compact in Ψ(A) t , thus, Ψ(A) t is (t, ω * )−pseudocompact.…”
Section: Proof We Apply Theorem 22 By Lettingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [4,5,12,13,18,20] some spaces which may be embedded as G δ -subsets of pseudocompact spaces were studied. In [19] the problem of pseudocompactness of the exponent was approached. In the present article we continue to investigate the G δ -subspaces of pseudocompact spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To complete the analogy, by propositions 0.4.23 and 0.4.24, we would need a theorem such as "if X is Tychonoff and that X ω is pseudocompact, then exp(X) is pseudocompact". It turns out that this result is false, as firstly proved in [43], but J. Ginsburg did not know about this at that time. We will discuss more about that in the next sections.…”
Section: Ultrafilter Versionmentioning
confidence: 96%