INTRODUCTIONSeroma pinna is a collection of fluid between the auricular cartilage and the perichondrium. It is a cystic swelling filled with serous fluid. Seromas can occur spontaneously or after surgery or trauma 1 .Extravasated fluid might clot leading to the deformity of the cartilage as well as the ear. Males are usually affected with unilateral presentation. Other morbidities include scarring, perichondritis and abscess formation. Depending on the nature of swellings and the symptoms, they can be distinguished from other conditions of the pinna.2 Successful treatment is challenging because of high rate of recurrence.Usual treatment used to consist of aspiration of the fluid and pressure bandage. Ghanem et al found recurrence of the seroma after aspiration and pressure bandage. Various other modalities have also been designed. Other methods include using buttons as pressure splints, excising a piece of cartilage and perichondrium to cure recurrent seromas, placement of a continuous portable suction drain has also been advised, suturing through and though after aspiration. 4 The multitude of options suggest lacuna of some degree in each such modality.
Aims and objectivesTo compare a more newer technique of through and through suturing in seroma pinna with the more traditional window method on the basis of patient ABSTRACT Background: Seroma pinna is a collection of fluid between the auricular cartilage and the perichondrium. Seromas can occur spontaneously or after surgery or trauma. Depending on the nature of swellings and the symptoms, they can be distinguished from other conditions of the pinna. Successful treatment is challenging because of high rate of recurrence. Usual treatment used to consist of aspiration of the fluid and pressure bandage. Methods include using buttons as pressure splints, excising a piece of cartilage and perichondrium to cure recurrent seromas 4 ,placement of a continuous portable suction drain has also been advised, suturing through and though after aspiration. Methods: In the first group of patients through and through suturing was done and in the second group window resection was done. Results: The recurrence rate was 5% for the first group patients while 20% for the second group. The percentage of development of perichondritis was 5% for group A and 15% for group B. Conclusions: The method put forward in this study is a simple and effective way for its management. The avoidance of dressing is a positive factor and positive factor is that it can be done on an OPD basis.