1997
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudodefect of the talar dome: an anatomic pitfall of ankle MR imaging.

Abstract: The pseudodefect of the talar dome is a normal groove for the posterior talofibular ligament and should not be misinterpreted as an articular erosion or osteochondral defect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference is primarily attributed to the spatial resolution limitation of the micro‐CT system and limitations in contrast (grayscale) resolution to discern objects of similar densities that are adjacent to each other (Wise and Winkelmann 2009a,b). Moreover, MRI is basically only useful for soft tissue, and pitfalls of using MRI to interpret changes in hard tissues have been repeatedly documented (Miller et al . 1997; Abe et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difference is primarily attributed to the spatial resolution limitation of the micro‐CT system and limitations in contrast (grayscale) resolution to discern objects of similar densities that are adjacent to each other (Wise and Winkelmann 2009a,b). Moreover, MRI is basically only useful for soft tissue, and pitfalls of using MRI to interpret changes in hard tissues have been repeatedly documented (Miller et al . 1997; Abe et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is primarily attributed to the spatial resolution limitation of the micro-CT system and limitations in contrast (grayscale) resolution to discern objects of similar densities that are adjacent to each other (Wise and Winkelmann 2009a,b). Moreover, MRI is basically only useful for soft tissue, and pitfalls of using MRI to interpret changes in hard tissues have been repeatedly documented (Miller et al 1997;Abe et al 2004;Wang et al 2009). Thus, to accurately evaluate the size and shape of small ossifying bones, the bone staining method has an advantage over these other methods, and is suitable to precisely observe developing bones, describe variations, and establish the standard.…”
Section: Comparison Between Bone Staining and Ct And Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudodefects-which should not be confused with osteochondral lesions that might be amenable to surgical intervention-have been described in several joints, including the hip (pseudodefect of the acetabular cartilage [2]) and the elbow (pseudodefect of the capitellum [3] and pseudodefect of the trochlear groove [4]). In the ankle, pseudodefects of the talar dome also have been described [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…143 Two normal variants of the talus are reported that may be potentially mistaken for an osteochondral lesion on MR. On sagittal images, the normal groove of the posterior talofibular ligament at the posterior aspect of the talus can be misinterpreted as an osteochondral defect. 144 The central pseudodefect of the talus produced by insertion of the tibiotalar fibers of the deltoid ligament into the talus may also mimic an osteochondral defect on the most medial sagittal images. 145 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION Articular cartilage is a critical component for the function of synovial joints.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Staging Of Osteochondral Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%