2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)70043-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudomalignant erosion in an inflammatory polyp at esophagocardial junction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum duration of anti-secretory therapy for polyp regression has also not been established. Endoscopic snare polypectomy may be required in those that are symptomatic [23,24]. Endoscopic mucosal resection is recommended in cases that are associated with Barrett's esophagus [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum duration of anti-secretory therapy for polyp regression has also not been established. Endoscopic snare polypectomy may be required in those that are symptomatic [23,24]. Endoscopic mucosal resection is recommended in cases that are associated with Barrett's esophagus [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sophageal reflux is considered to be a cause of IEGPs (1,2). This case suggests that acidity may play a role in the pathogenesis of IEGPs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Reflux gastroesophageal polyp is an inflammatory polypoid lesion at the esophagogastric junction caused by reflux esophagitis [ 1 3 ]. The histology of the polyp shows hyperplastic cardiac mucosa with or without squamous epithelium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When reflux gastroesophageal polyps are accompanied with pseudomalignant erosion, biopsy specimens obtained from the polyps confound the pathologist in reaching a correct histological diagnosis, particularly in cases with striking atypia. Even though benign in nature, these polyps can rapidly grow in size and are mostly resected through endoscopy due to the suspicion of malignancy [ 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%