2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2003.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudopolarography of trace metals. Part II. The comparison of the reversible, quasireversible and irreversible electrode reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatment of the experimental polarographic curve produced a normalized polarogram presented in the inset in Figure 5, along with the simulated [32] polarogram. A method known as a logarithmic analysis of the polarogram is suitable for testing system reversibility [25, 28 -32].…”
Section: Sampled DC Polarographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The treatment of the experimental polarographic curve produced a normalized polarogram presented in the inset in Figure 5, along with the simulated [32] polarogram. A method known as a logarithmic analysis of the polarogram is suitable for testing system reversibility [25, 28 -32].…”
Section: Sampled DC Polarographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as previosly shown [32], the logarithmic analysis is unsuitable method for determining the transfer coefficient (a) for the quasireversible reactions. Therefore, a was determined by constructing a simulated polarogram.…”
Section: Sampled DC Polarographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The well-known pseudopolarographic approach in trace metal speciation [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] has recently attracted new attention due to the possibility to automate the process of recording of pseudopolarograms. The benefit of using pseudopolarography and a recently developed analogous technique, scanned (deposition potential) stripping chronopotentiometry (SSCP), is that obtained information about metal complexation are similar to classical polarography, but achieved at significantly lower metal concentrations [11,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of using pseudopolarography and a recently developed analogous technique, scanned (deposition potential) stripping chronopotentiometry (SSCP), is that obtained information about metal complexation are similar to classical polarography, but achieved at significantly lower metal concentrations [11,[22][23][24]. As it is theoretically described and experimentally verified, the complexation of a metal by a ligand will cause a (slight) shift of reduction wave of labile complexes towards more negative potentials, while the inert complexes are separately reduced at more negative potentials comparing to labile complexes [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The magnitude of these shifts (for both labile and inert complexes) is related to the stability constant of the formed complex and to the concentration of the free complexing ligand in the case of labile complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%