2016
DOI: 10.33338/ef.60259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) in Estonia: new records and an annotated checklist

Abstract: The current knowledge of pseudoscorpions in Estonia is summarized, based on specimens preserved in various Estonian collections and new material collected from 1993 to 2015. Altogether 474 studied specimens belonged to 14 species, including nine species recorded from Estonia for the first time. Supplemented by Apocheiridium rossicum, listed by literature data only, the number of known Estonian pseudoscorpions is now set at 15. The findings of Mesochelifer ressli are the northernmost known for the species. Some… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of N. carcinoides in the Nordic countries is well known (Weygoldt 1969, Stol 2006, Sammet et al 2016, and in the current research in Lithuania the species was the most numerous one. However, the occurrence of N. crassifemoratum in Lithuania was unexpected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The occurrence of N. carcinoides in the Nordic countries is well known (Weygoldt 1969, Stol 2006, Sammet et al 2016, and in the current research in Lithuania the species was the most numerous one. However, the occurrence of N. crassifemoratum in Lithuania was unexpected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The occurrence of C. cimicoides, D. cyrneus, A. wideri and P. scorpioides in the Nordic countries has already been recorded (Stol 2006, Sammet et al 2016 and the presence of C. hahnii in Latvia, neighbouring Lithuania, was recently recorded by Telnov and Salmane (2015). The current findings of these species in Lithuania further improved the knowledge of their distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…New material was collected using: (1) pitfall traps, (2) Tullgren funnel and Kempson apparatus, (3) sifting moss, leaf litter and detritus with a standard entomological sieve, (4) manual searching in suitable habitats and daytime retreats, and (5) as by-catch of non-target species with window pane traps (attached to tree trunks) and Malaise traps (for particular description of the trapping projects, see Sammet et al 2016 and Tomasson et al 2014 , respectively).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%