Pseudotoric structures: Lagrangian submanifolds and Lagrangian fibrations

Tyurin, Nikolai Andreevich

doi:10.1070/rm9764

Cited by 5 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[3]). As it was shown in [1] it admits a pseudotoric structure (f 1 , ..., f n−1 , Ψ, B) where f 1 , ..., f n−1 are pairwise commuting moment maps derived from the complete set of first integrals by linear transformations, B ⊂ M is the base set, Ψ : M \B → CP 1 w is the map with symplectic fibers, preserved by the Hamiltonian action of each X fi (the "commutation" relation for Ψ and f i ). Recall the main idea of the construction.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 55%

“…"commutes" with Ψ: its Hamiltonian action preserves the fibers of Ψ. Therefore the data (f 1 , Ψ, B) define a pseudotoric structure on CP 2 , see [1]. Then as it was shown in [1], any choice of a smooth loop γ ⊂ (CP 1 \{[1 : 0], [0 : 1]}) gives a lagrangian torus…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…if γ is non contractible then T (γ, 0) is of the standard type being Hamiltonian isotopic to a standard Liouville torus given by the toric structure on CP 2 , otherwise T (γ, 0) is non standard lagrangian torus of Chekanov type. The proofs and discussion can be found in [1].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second example. Consider the direct product M = CP 1 × CP 1 endowed with the product symplectic form ω of type (1,1). Thus M is a complex 2 -dimnesional quadric.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fix homogenious coordinates [x i : y i ] for i -th component, then the standard toric structure is given by the set of moment maps (f 1 , ...,f n ) wheref i = |xi| 2 |xi| 2 +|yi| 2 , the boundary divisor D b = {X f1 ∧ ... ∧ X fn = 0} consists of 2n components D 1 i = {x i = 0}, D 2 i = {y i = 0}; the standard toric fibration admits monontonic lagrangian torus T n Cl = {f 1 = ... =f n = 1 2 } ⊂ M . In [1] one introduces a natural pseudotoric structure on M given by the…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Monotonic Lagrangian Tori of Standard and Nonstandard Types in Toric and Pseudotoric Fano Varieties

Tyurin

2019

Proc. Steklov Inst. Math.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent papers, summarized in survey [1], we construct a number of examples of non standard lagrangian tori on compact toric varieties and as well on certain non toric varieties which admit pseudotoric structures. Using this pseudotoric technique we explain how non standard lagrangian tori of Chekanov type can be constructed and what is the topological difference between standard Liouville tori and the non standard ones. However we have not discussed the natural question about the periods of the constructed twist tori; in particular the monotonicity problem for the monotonic case was not studied there. In the paper we present several remarks on these questions, in particular we show for the monotonic case how to construct non standard lagrangian tori which satisify the monotonicity condition. First of all we study non standard tori which are Bohr -Sommerfeld with respect to the anticanonical class. This notion was introduced in [2], where one defines certain universal Maslov class for the BScan lagrangian submanifolds in compact simply connected monotonic symplectic manifolds. Then we show how monotonic non standard lagrangian tori of Chekanov type can be constructed. Furthemore we extend the consideration to pseudotoric setup and construct examples of monotonic lagrangian tori in non toric monotonic manifolds: complex 4dimensional quadric and full flag variety F 3 . * The author is partially supported by Laboratory of Mirror Symmetry NRU HSE, RF Government grant, ag. N 14.641.31.0001 their symplectic areas which gives the set of periods (p a1 , ..., p an ) defined up to Z. Clearly any lagrangian S is BS k if and only if the periods belong to 1 k Z; any other choice of the basis corresponds to a transformation of the period vector by SL(n, Z), therefore for any lagrangian torus one can define its Bohr -Sommerfeld level as the minimal k such that every kp ai belongs to Z if it exists or if it does not saying that it is BS ∞ .Fixing any almost complex structure J on M , compatible with ω, we get the complex determinant line bundle K −1 M = detT 1,0 M which we call anticanoncial line bundle following the tradition. It depends on the choice of J, but its first Chern class does not being integer valued therefore it is a topological invariant of symplectic manifold. Consider the case of monotonic symplecitc manifold namely when c 1 (K −1 M ) = k[ω] for certain integer k. For this case we say that a lagrangian torus S ⊂ M is Bohr -Sommerfeld with respect to the anticanonical bundle (or BS can for short) if it is Bohr -Sommmerfeld of level k.Remark. This assignment looks a bit artificial in general symplectic setup, but from the point of view of algebraic geometry it looks more natural. Indeed, consider a Fano variety X. By the very definition its anticanonical line bundle K −1 X is ample therefore certain power (K −1 X ) m induces an embedding of X to the projective space. Then choosing a standard Kahler form Ω on the projective space and restricting it to the image of X we get a symplectic form mω on X such that sing...

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 55%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second example. Consider the direct product M = CP 1 × CP 1 endowed with the product symplectic form ω of type (1,1). Thus M is a complex 2 -dimnesional quadric.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations